/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"I ain't driving 20 minutes to riot."

catalog
Mode: Thread
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8192

Files

Max file size: 80.00 MB

Max files: 5

Captcha
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


/leftypol/ is a non-sectarian board for leftist discussion. Join the Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/+leftychat:matrix.org Visit the Booru: https://lefty.booru.org/

(38.56 KB 1000x524 Nrx_flag.png)
(5.20 KB 500x400 Incend_Statelib.png)
(6.25 KB 225x225 indir.png)
Neo-Cameralism and Voluntary-Communes Anonymous 10/25/2020 (Sun) 15:41:28 No. 1034357 [Reply] [Last]
What is leftypol's thoughs on those ideologies? As you know we live in democracy every group tries to force their values to society but are we really need that?It's like mine values are true ones so all of society should be forced to them or i would be angryy !!11!shit;really why can't we have seperate communities for everybody. Are you green-vegan?go to place where is nearly full of tress.are you an white-fascist?go and live in ethno-commune.dou you not like lgbt?go and live lgbt-free place.are you support mutualism instead communism?then go and live in mutualist place.It's simple.Why are we fighting each other on things like lgbt is degenaracy and should be removed or we all humans should live together even if it's forced ?
16 posts and 3 images omitted.
Is forcing rapists into a cell a violation of anarchist principles :thonking:
(105.46 KB 1600x900 cover5.jpg)
>>1034602 The other amazing thing about the Amish is that they're not separated from the rest of the society by any borders. They live in the midst of the most commercially-minded capitalist society in the world and have still managed to maintain their traditions. Their separation is psychological, although also material as they deliberately limit the distance they can travel by refusing to use cars. And they keep to their culture by refusing to watch television or use the internet. If you don't want to be swept up by changes wrought by modernity, stop watching movies, stop playing video games, stop posting online. Unplug and go live on a farm in a patriarchal Bible collective. My brother knows a Greek Orthodox nun who does use the internet, but she literally lives in a Greek Orthodox monastery on a mountaintop in Greece. Pretty cool pen pal to have because they make a lot of stuff themselves and will send you gift packages in the mail. But the modern megachurch Protestant stuff in the U.S. and so on is really weird to her. But modernity is not so bad, if you think about it: https://youtu.be/BQ_ovV6PoRk
>>1034567 Youth sets a person's subconscious views for the rest of their lives.
>>1034860 So there'll be more homosexuals ending up with a BBC fetish and heterosexuals ending up with a cuck fetish Not my cup of tea but no big deal and definitely not my problem

Is it sadistic or wrong to genuinely want rightards to fucking suffer? Anonymous 10/16/2020 (Fri) 11:13:16 No. 1004472 [Reply] [Last]
I despise rightoids, like, the thought that there actually people as well and not just human-sized rodents makes me physically ill, it's difficult for me to decide what I hate about rightoids the most, whether it's the fact that they're stupid fucking animals who know even less about the world than liberals, or whether it's the fact that they're monstrous pieces of shit with nothing redeemable inside them. It's difficult to comprehend rightards as even being worthy of redemption, like, take the average Nazi officer or the average US general; why should such people be given any leeway ever? Were I Joseph Stalin I would order that every SS motherfucker in detainment gets fucking flayed alive. Know what, I know why I hate rightoids. It's because they're specifically evil, but also very, very stupid. Like, look at these people, they're literally just savage fucking animals. If you see a rightard that isn't an utter coward, notice how they're usually just mindless apes. Neanderthals. Fucking animals. At least liberals want to build something, even the most psychotic communist still wants a better world; the goals of rightoids however is to build NOTHING, these faggots only have destruction as a goal. Whether the QAnon retards in America who effectively want to destroy a government to save capitalism even though the government only exists to do this; or whether it's the Nazoid fags of the Reich who accomplished nothing beyond turning Europe into ruins, the right wing literally has no goal but the destruction of societies and human lives, at best they only exist to keep parasites in power. How could any sane society not just euthanize rightoids as a matter of principle?
126 posts and 5 images omitted.
>>1034760 >www.theoccidentalobserver.net lol
>>1034851 >1917 the politburo only had one non jewish member, josef stalin >total cohencidence
>>1034831 why would i wanna do that?
>>1034850 Into the Barbara pit son Spelunking is a great hobby
>>1034840 no u kill all faggots and kill all transhumanists
idpol

(218.01 KB 1024x753 Ben Garrison Marx.jpg)
egalitarianism and Marxism Anonymous 10/25/2020 (Sun) 02:27:07 No. 1033078 [Reply] [Last]
Marxism doesn't actually seem very egalitarian, which seems to be its biggest strength. Proles are the largest, most essential class to any economy, so they should rise up and crush the parasites above and below them who immiserate them. There don't seem to be any appeals to fairness within Marx, so why are most Western Marxists egalitarians? Why do they make appeals to fairness instead of greatness or violence?
68 posts and 1 image omitted.
>>1034662 >Look now, see how many people choose welfare over labor. This is idealist autismo. Why do you think they choose welfare over labor, because they’re just lazy? Could it be that they’ve been seeking work, but there’s no one hiring them, so they gave up? Could it be that there’s no jobs? Could it be that if they start working, they’ll lose benefits and not be able to afford their homes or food even if they gain employment? Could they be working through mental health issues?
>>1034414 >Classlessness is the first and easiest goal to accomplish. Except for the part about the Nomenklatura replacing the capitalists as the ruling class, with the working class still on the bottom
>>1034748 Except for the part where that's not an analysis of class, but of political structure. You can cry about that all you want, but don't muddy the concept of class to suit your agenda.
(141.20 KB 480x563 Marx Laugh.jpg)
>>1034443 >>1034445 >>1034449 >>1034453 >>1034456 >>1034472 >>1034476 >>1034479 >>1034484 >>1034492 >>1034509 >>1034526 >>1034609 >>1034662 >>1034748 each time this nigga posts its a new anticommie neolib talking point like he reads them off a list. go back to your special needs class and listen to the adults talk for a change
(3.94 KB 259x194 barry.jfif)
>>1034483 >That's really where the soviet union failed with its economic planning model was its economic planning model could not meet the needs of the people because there was a lack of democratic measure in the planning processes. This is misguided, its not exactly that the soviet union failed due to its decision making organization but instead it failed on applying this model effectively due to lack of technological progress, , in order for their to be a good state of communications there needs to be an established channel of information between the different sector or enterprises of the economy and the planning organism itself.This coupled with the fact that the soviet union didn´t have in is time the capability to calculate values, made the production process worse, since they couldn´t track most of the prices of goods and services which were circulating, , so most of the time prices didn´t correlate with socially necessary labour time at all. So no, it wasn´t cause it was anti-democratic, it was because they were limited by the technology of their time, making it almost impossible for a communication that could correct planning mistakes automatically, whilst in reality it took time, and caused inefficiency. >There's also the fact that if you can convince people to help you in the community you can just go build the house yourself. This is just planning, in order to build a house you need people who know how to do it, people who´ved studied you need architects, engineers, you need an apparatus which can coordinate that they will appear at the moment of the construction, that they will also get paid accordingly, that they are indeed trained professionals, so you need to find a way to certify or corroborate their expertise probably with the apt institution which issues a diploma, none of these are born out of the blue, you need coordination with these different sections, which function according to a plan.The materials to construct where are you going to get them?, this is even worse if you don´t have them around you have to get them from outside the "community", even then you´d still need coordination which those who produce it, which probably go according to the plan, which would mean redoing the plan in order to produce more for house making, so you do need to follow the plan, and gathering resources forms a clear part of it. So yes, you do need a state, an organizer of society, otherwise you can´t make anything, specially when you need to subject the will of others to majority rule, how do you do it?, military, these are all essential parts of the state itself.

(146.93 KB 680x680 5e757f1b3e89a.jpeg)
Monitary Policy Anonymous 10/24/2020 (Sat) 17:53:33 No. 1031782 [Reply] [Last]
How much longer can porky keep using monetary policy to save themselves from economic crisis.
11 posts and 2 images omitted.
>>1031782 more interested can they keep negative interest rates and for how long?
>>1033630 >Housing prices are becoming less affordable that's not due to QE or monetary expansion
>>1034198 Low interest rates allow porky to hoard massive amounts of housing stock that would normally be unaffordable to hold, driving up the price. >>1034119 Forever unless there is a war. For a country like Japan it never had to throw its geopolitical weight around because the system is guaranteed by a third country, the US. However the policies damage the US real economy to such an extent in the end if a geopolitical rival was able to independently challenge it it would suffer such an ignoble defeat as to throw the entire system in chaos.
>>1033788 >they can repeat the process forever. Lol, no process can be forever repeated. Every-time the loop goes for another round it gets harder.
>>1034115 Fitting image. :^)

(7.15 MB 8000x7949 the dream.png)
Unified Humanity Anonymous 10/25/2020 (Sun) 01:06:14 No. 1032809 [Reply] [Last]
I wish humanity was united. We have so many differences and yet we can't settle on something. So I propose a one world government under a federation. One flag for humanity. We should seek to survive as a species, not by nationality or ethnicity. You know it's kind of funny. Humans have existed for so long and waged many wars towards each other. I'm surprised we haven't been declared extinct earlier but I mean, who's there to record that? I'm not saying I hate humanity but I know that we can do better. We can't let nationalism and reactionary ideas hold us back. The former along with class divisions resulted in most of the wars in history. Religions and spirituality isn't bad but people should have a choice between that and secularism. But yeah, a world federal government that caters to the people, without any corruption, and is held accountable should be the goal so that when we increase our influence throughout the cosmos, we're doing so under one flag. In order to survive as a species, we need to develop revolutionary ideas that fits the modern and progressive world. It's 2020, getting stoned because you have committed a sin is completely backwards. It's okay to admire the empires and dynasties of the past but we need to understand that they're long gone. But deep down, we're all human, a species that have overcome many disasters. I'm concerned about the affects of climate change but I know we can get through this. We can get through this pandemic. But only if we come to our differences, respect each other, and work together as a unified species. Language is the one barrier between us so I propose that we should only recognize the first ten most spoken ones. Freedom, Justice, and Peace.
47 posts and 11 images omitted.
>>1033518 all your homies are massive retards
>>1033764 >signing =/= doing These countries still need to act upon the Declaration. China is committing genocide on the Uygurs and on its own citizens as we speak and the US is killing Muslims in camps like Gitmo. Not to mention France's upcoming concentration camps for when the teacher got lynched.
>>1034194 cope harder glowie
>>1034697 >China is committing genocide on the Uygurs no, stop repeating the mainstream news, they make shit up >US is killing Muslims in camps like Gitmo. If you want to talk about USA killing Muslims look at the drone war, gitmo is bad but the scale is tiny. >Not to mention France's upcoming concentration camps for when the teacher got lynched. France is going to do concentration camps because of the sword murderer ? WTF how did you figure that ?

(471.39 KB 840x997 Left Unity.jpg)
Socialism Without Adjectives - No more hyphenated and sectarian half-socialism! unityfag 10/25/2020 (Sun) 09:49:32 No. 1033852 [Reply] [Last]
Hello, /leftypol/. Today I'd like to talk to you about socialism, its hyphenation into many variations (eco-socialism, feminist socialism, libertarian socialism, democratic socialism and all the rest of the socialisms), the purpose of these X-socialisms and why we should ultimately move away from them. To me, socialism refers to the socialist mode of production while communism refers to the communist society, just to define the terms. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_mode_of_production) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_society) In the socialist movement, people might ask the question: "What kind of a socialist are you?" Being symptomatic to the variety of different socialist political identities and, in practice, a new kind of tribalism and identity shopping we see today (like the hipster socialists we are both online and offline/"IRL"), the nature of this question and its implications need to be addressed. These adjectives serve as identifiers for the "good" and "bad" socialisms in our minds, resulting in the segregation and division of parts of the socialist movement and ideology we may not agree with, causing splits and infighting among us. Why do I call these socialist schools of thought, these X-socialisms (X being any adjective such as "democratic" or "libertarian") for lack of a better term, half-socialism? Because they imply the inadequacy and insufficiency of socialism alone to solve the issues contained by the adjective (women's liberation, democracy, freedom, environmentalism and the rest) and so it's implied socialism requires the other half in form of the adjective. Additionally, the end result of this dilutes the socialist part of each hyphenated socialism, causing them to be literally "half as socialist" compared to just socialism itself. Here is an example: eco-socialism (AKA green left and red greens), a very popular socialist school of thought in Europe originating from the new left and being represented by the European United Left-Nordic Green Left European parliamentary group and its predominantly demsoc member parties. What is this in practice? It is a parliamentary and reformist socialism, seeking to build socialism through parliamentary reforms in capitalism. But what socialism is there, when the eco-socialists only want a highly regulated and taxed welfare state with social justice and emphasis on concern for the environment (a noble cause which, too, in practice is reduced to ethical consumerism and pushing the responsibilities and duties to the working class). Where is the socialism in eco-socialism? Nowhere, as it turns out, all the while with a socialist mode of production in place and the abolition of capitalist production, socialism alone would materially reach the goals of environmentalism easier, better, harder, faster and stronger than any "eco-socialism" and most other "green" movements and ideologies. Despite this, eco-socialism contains in it the implication that socialism by itself doesn't care about the environment, or even worse, is for environmental destruction in order to reach its goals. Other X-socialisms contain similar baseless accusations: libertarian socialism implies socialism to be unfree, democratic socialism implies socialism to be undemocratic, all the while both have in practice and materially resulted in no more freedom or democracy than socialism by itself. Why should we still hold onto these half-socialisms? What is their merit, if this is what they do? It is a matter of direction of the ideological transformation of individuals as well as the recruitment and radicalization of non-socialists into socialists in the following form: Non-socialist political identity X --> X-socialism --> Socialism This is how it is supposed to go. The half-socialist's transformation into a (full) socialist is a necessary step in the formation of a highly functioning and united socialist movement. This has not been the direction we have gone towards in history, however. Socialism itself has degenerated and gone backwards into a series of disunited half-socialisms fighting against one another and competing in the "free market of ideas" of capitalist society. Overall, we have not progressed or gone forward.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

3 posts omitted.
>>1033852 Did you just invent a new socialist tendency: socialism without adjectives ? SWA? And you claim that this is the true socialism, unlike all those others not real socialisms ? Your analysis is not without merit, but this has been tried before. A metaphor with coffee shops: People decide the no longer want 50 different flavored coffees, they just want black coffee. Starbugs would immediately create a menu where they have coffee without milkfoam, coffee without pumpkin aroma, coffee without whipped cream, coffee without vanilla syrup, coffee without chocolate flakes. This problem cannot be solved with branding changes. You do have to look at actual organizational tactics. The eco-anarcho-feminist flavored coffee is a commodity, you are right about this. You are however wrong about not categorizing political movements by what they do, whom they organize, what interests they represent. You can not take the labels of political organizations at face value. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⢴⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣢⡤⣀⡀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣺⣷⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠛⠋⠉⠉⣿⡌⠉⠉⠛⠫⠿⢿⡿⣿⣿⣷⣢⣄ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣔⣽⣿⡿⡿⠟⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣜⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠻⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣰⣿⣿⣿⡟⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠹⣿⣿⣿⣷⡄ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣿⡫⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣮⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⡿⣿⣾⣦ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣿⡗⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣆ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⡟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣿⣿⡆ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⠻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⢻⣿⣿⣣ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡟⠀⠀⠙⠫⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⠟⠊⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⡀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠙⠿⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠱⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠁⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⡇ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣿ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣿⡿⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⡎ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣷⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠚⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡠⣿⣿⣿⠇

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>1033916 >no unity Sir, this is /leftypol/. Also, without unity and working with people of various political identities, you can't exactly push them towards socialism from their hyphenated school of thought. >>1033919 The problems you mentioned are precisely the reasons why I proposed what I proposed. Socialism has to be made into one thing with a clear, sensible and agreeable definition to rally both people of various political identities as well as those without any around it. This is possible, because socialism by itself not only doesn't really care about one's ideological preferences or concerns but also with the abolition of capitalism would allow all these concerns to be addressed without the shackles of a capitalist base. Christians could be "truly" christian, muslims could be "truly" muslim, nationalists "true" nationalists, feminists "truly" feminist, greens "truly" green and so on. Agreement on tactics can also be reached with rigorous deliberation and study of what has worked and works now. The ultimate decisions on it then made with democratic vote, after which unity in that regard has to be enforced. What qualities do you think socialists should all share, besides working towards socialism? Where's the line drawn beyond which it becomes gatekeeping? From the OP: >Why should we still hold onto these half-socialisms? What is their merit, if this is what they do? It is a matter of direction of the ideological transformation of individuals as well as the recruitment and radicalization of non-socialists into socialists That is to say, I would ultimately be doing away with labels, but not right away, or rather, would show how those side ideologies of different socialists are already accommodated by socialism itself to make those labels wither away. Working together with various X-socialists is not a matter of ability but of willingness and discipline. Socialists have to be able to recognize socialism as primary (otherwise, why would we be striving for it in the first place) and various side ideologies as secondary. >>1033929 >Did you just invent a new socialist tendency No, nothing new about it nor was it my intention. >And you claim that this is the true socialism, unlike all those others not real socialisms ? I never claimed that. Only that in practice, many of those hyphenated socialisms have turned out to dilute socialism. "Without adjectives" is not supposed to be an adjective in of itself, if you catch my meaning. >Your analysis is not without merit, but this has been tried before. A metaphor with coffee shops Exactly, which is why I said this is nothing new. The coffee shop metaphor is not equivalent to what I'm proposing. My intent is not to, say, make my own party with the central tenet being left unity, as is the meme about all sorts of unity-leftists, because that would mean I played myself at square one by already having split from everyone else. >>1034007

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>1034165 >I never claimed that. Only that in practice, many of those hyphenated socialisms have turned out to dilute socialism. "Without adjectives" is not supposed to be an adjective in of itself, if you catch my meaning. But it will become an adjective. The hyphenated socialisms are a product of the class status of the people that create it. The branding schema is irrelevant. Analise what these people do, find out what interests they defend and how they organize. Use labels that reflect what you figured out from your analysis and ignore what these people claim to be. Titles do not matter. You are pursuing the right direction, but you need to learn to look what is behind the branding, not take it at face value.
>>1033929 I think the idea is not to create a new socialist tendency, but rather to create an organization that contains socialists of many different tendencies. Each tendency can then democratically deliberate with other tendencies to create a united socialist movement that is generally favorable to everyone.

(10.60 KB 259x194 pipe.jpeg)
Pipeline to the left Anonymous 10/25/2020 (Sun) 10:21:03 No. 1033905 [Reply] [Last]
Why isn't the left able to create a liberal/socdem to communist pipeline, the same way there was a libertarian/conservative to fash pipeline?
20 posts and 3 images omitted.
>>1033970 While i think that is true i also think that Beardtube is on more solid ground than Breadtube and in the long run the difference will emerge (if we don't get outright banned and suppressed from all platforms)
>>1033931 >be on /leftypol/ >ask if someone's memeing left unity where exactly did you think you were
>>1034049 Leftypol
Liberals have NEVER and WILL NEVER convert to Marxist viewpoints. 99.99999% of them aren't even working class FFS.

(23.70 KB 180x284 de-BORED.jpeg)
Anonymous 10/24/2020 (Sat) 20:58:04 No. 1032145 [Reply] [Last]
This is really good in parts and really navel-gazey and obtuse in other parts. I'm having a hard time muscling my way through. I also expected a lot more meditations on culture and a lot less outright Marxist economic theory. What are others' thoughts on this shit?
1 post omitted.
>>1032145 My hot take is stuff like this is basically self help but for leftists. Sort of like the thinking man's Jordan Peterson, it provides context for why everything feels like shit but doesn't actually give a concrete formulation for action.
>>1032279 That's kind of the feeling I've gotten reading it. Sometimes I feel like it verges on attributing every negative thing you can possibly experience to capitalism, which I think is maybe a lazy way of understanding yourself and the world around you. It does have a lot of useful interpretations and concepts though.
Bump. Interested in hearing others' ideas about this.
Is the english translation any good ? I felt like it relied a lot on the subtleties of the french language.
>>1034631 Haven't read the french but it does seem to me that a lot must be lost in translation. There's a lot of word play that is pretty clumsy and I imagine works much better and makes more sense in the original.

(57.24 KB 1024x1024 CyberWiphala.png)
Operation: /Cyber_Wiphala/ Anonymous 10/19/2020 (Mon) 11:27:04 No. 1013411 [Reply] [Last]
Our goal is simple, to put the government of Bolivia under President Arce in contact with Glasgow University professor, Dr. Paul Cockshott PhD.
321 posts and 38 images omitted.
last updates?
>>1034090 nope none so far, I dunno if email anon got a reply from his last email
>>1034703 Sadly he did not respond, hoping he's taking contact by himself
Guys dickblow is in my matrix dms asking me for feetpics hwat do
>>1034712 let's hope so

(834.96 KB 1500x1072 Wallpaper 8.jpg)
Anonymous 10/23/2020 (Fri) 14:41:48 No. 1028177 [Reply] [Last]
If you had the power to run the world as you see fit how would you run it? What would be your ideal world?
35 posts and 5 images omitted.
(551.72 KB 1920x1080 1600621956580.jpg)
>>1028177 >Sortitioned executive branch, with mandates from a representative jury voting on proposals from elected parties. >Non-voters are automatically registered with the Communist Party. >Mandatory military service. > C Y B E R N E T I C S >Restructure production and civilian life to combat climate change. This should be enough for me to relinquish my status as God-Emperor and comfortably watch anime for the rest of my days.
My ideal world is one in which people do not lose the joy and the utopianism of their youth, no matter how much they age. So basically just a world where prussian school system doesn't exist and working/surviving doesn't suck the soul out of your body.
>>1028177 Well as the supreme triple digit IQ tradcath god emperor you have made me, I will ensure that (in no particular order of importance) 1. Twitter is deleted off the face of the planet. I'll give 10 days for everyone to keep contact over mutuals etc. before I delete that place from here to kingdom come. 2. Ensure that /pol/ and any other /pol/tier behaviour is deleted off the chans. I will reform /v/ and turn it into /dmc/, where the only vidya we talk about is devil may cry. /r9k/ will also follow suit in being wiped off the face of the net. If such god awful behaviour continues, simply delete the chans. 3. Delete Reddit, but keep some of the table top communities active. r/battlemaps for instance. 4. End world hunger. 5. Ensure that mass advertising is a thing of the past. Have a fucking EXPO or some shit like E3 every 3 months or so, so we can see new developments in technology, movies etc. 6. A lot more attention and resources given to the arts. Lord knows we need another renaissance of film to combat the needless amount of capeshit we have. 7. Mass deportation of right wing ideologues and personalities to an artificially made island off the coast of Antartica. They can create whatever society they want so long as we don't have to deal with it.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

(7.32 MB 375x200 Nuke America.gif)
>>1028177 >If you had the power to run the world as you see fit how would you run it? What would be your ideal world? Nuke America.
Mandatory Human Extinction Project The full capacity of manpower and resources availible to the world's military and industry must be utilized to the end of exterminating all members of homo sapiens within no less than 10 years, and with no restrictions placed on the technologies and strategies used in this effort. Conventional, chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear arsenals are all acceptable, so long as it creates weekly death tolls that outpace global human reproduction by an order of magnitude.

Delete
Report

no cookies?