>Northern Europeans are vitamin D deficient at a higher level than other more southern places why is this?
probably because they stay inside all day trying to convert reactionaries to leftism
>you mean, the CIA and other intelligence services and there use of the right wing to destroy the left through these groups
wait, why do you want to invite them in again?
>Seems like as good a use of time as dunking on anarchists or something
In abstract sure, but this isn't in abstract, it is part of a consistent trend of trying to bring on reactionaries and other assorted internet weirdos under the false presumption they might ever change, when you can never logic a person out of a position they didn't logic themselves into. reactionary beliefs are pathological, and there is no way to get rid of those beliefs online, people will just log off when their pathological beliefs are challenged and revalidate them via talking to other people which are like-minded.
>burden of proof my guy is on you
are you retarded? the site doesn't have (you)s so its not like I could even verify a post as mine, if you are really so interested go ask a mod.
>the last raid was a resounding success, everyone agrees.
in that we didn't raid and the /pol/acks all left after getting buttmad. it was a success insofar as we just made them angry, they invaded here, encountered resistance, and went away. nothing like your incredibly dumb recruitment program.
>We only get them by converting reactionaries (basically everybody who is not a communist is reactionary to some degree it why /pol/ is popular)
1. most people on /leftypol/ are not ex-reactionary. its a board mythology that just isn't true, from all my experiences talking to people. there are really just a very small minority of them that only have some over-representation because of the massive attrition we suffered from the split. they aren't even a plurality of membership, nor are newer members generally ex-reactionaries either. they are a negligible at best source of recruitment, if they even recruit correctly. but most of them seem to inevitably show their reactionary stripes again, for the reasons I have described.
2. not everyone is a reactionary. maybe quit projecting? but there are plenty of people who are socially-progressive without a clear understanding of class - while this dooms them to never achieve their social-progressive goals, their hearts are in the right place, and they are easy converts if you can show them how their tactics fail. aka, actually doing logical arguments which permanently impact their way of thinking, as opposed to reactionaries who only act by emotional impulse.