/gulag/ - Gulag

Meta Board. Where you belong

catalog
Mode: Reply
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8192

Files

Max file size: 20.00 MB

Max files: 3

Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


IRC: Rizon.net #bunkerchan
https://qchat.rizon.net/?channels=bunkerchan

(53.21 KB 720x960 EcsGpUaXsAAt03p.jpeg)
/leftypol/ Mod feeback thread Mod feeback thread 07/13/2020 (Mon) 17:33:32 No. 5320
/leftypol/ Mod feeback thread /leftypol/ Mod feeback thread Mod logs: https://bunkerchan.xyz/logs.js?boardUri=leftypol Substitute leftypol with whatever board you want to check. Questions about why you were banned. Appeals. General inquiries. Complaints.
Edited last time by antious666 on 07/27/2020 (Mon) 21:23:56.
>>5320 I don't like the new haircut you got. You look ugly now. Also why does my asshole itch so much?
STOP DELETING MY POSTS YOU FAGGOTS WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?!
>>5343 if you're posting discord links, that is not allowed. Because it's Cointelpro shit
>>5344 Might I suggest the the volunteer committee filtering discord links to "COINTELPRO SHIT USE RIOT.FM or something along the lines to both automate action on discouraging discord use and reducing grievances from the young lads and lasses who want to use it since anyone determined enough to actually use discord can back engineer the original discord link
Hey vol comrades I'd just gone to the trouble of constructing the post copypastad below on a new lysenko OP only to find the post 404ed when I hit reply which was frustrating as the cut and paste and formatting is a lot of work on a small touchscreen lysenkoism is actually easily defensible and as Marx stated in freedom of the press censorship gives the censored information a halo Kind regards Copypasta below: Stop worrying and use it to demonstrate the power of Soviet superscience https://www.resilience.org/stories/2020-05-15/fruit-trenches-cultivating-subtropical-plants-in-freezing-temperatures/ " “Progressive cold-hardening” Imported citrus varieties only survived in a few isolated points along the Black Sea coast, which enjoyed a particularly favourable microclimate. To better prepare citrus fruits for cold, Soviet citrologists followed a method called “progressive cold-hardening”. It allowed them to create new varieties which were adapted to local ecological conditions, a cultivation strategy which had originally been developed for apricot trees and grapes. The method consists of planting a seed of a highly valued tree a bit further north of its original location, and then waiting for it to give seeds. Those seeds are then planted a bit further north, and with the process repeated further, slowly but steadily pushing the citrus variety towards less hospitable climates. Using this method, apricot trees from Rostov could eventually be grown in Mitchurinsk, 650 km further up north, where they developed apricot seeds that were adapted to the local climate. On the other hand, directly planting the seed of the Rostov apricot tree in Mitchurinsk proved unsuccessful. "
Please consider some general policy of cleansing the boards of bourgeois democratic propaganda, whether it be pro-Trump, -Biden or -Kanye. It has no place on here, we're not free advertising space; they've got the rest of the web for that.
>>5344 No, actually it was a post against discord in Sage's organising thread. And actually, it wasn't deleted, my mistake.
(225.74 KB 2048x1152 Depressed Unruhe.jpg)
>>5320 was ban for a month for ""DOXING"" because i check the meta data of image to see what camera they used ? because i legit curious about it. Should i make a thread in /tech/ to educated people about meta data ?
>>5357 >Should i make a thread in /tech/ to educated people about meta data ? Yes
>>5357 WHY THE FUCK DOES LEFTYPOL NOT CLEAR THE METADATA??? DO THEY WANT US TO GET JAILED BY THE GLOWIES???? RETARDS EVEN 4CHAN CLEARS THE EXIDF DATA AND META OF ANYBODY WHO UPLOADS PICTURES THERE
>>5359 Please do this mods.
>>5351 Lysenkoism and epigenetics aren't the same thing, and even if they were, the fact that there was no good evidence for the latter in Lysenko's time means it was still unscientific.
>>5357 What's the ban id. >>5359 >>5360 Please contribute the code and we'll try to integrate it soon.
>>5320 Do you plan on letting us post images on mobile? It has never worked, so I can’t post anything.
(85.70 KB 900x900 image0-19.jpg)
>>5368 Posting images from mobile has always worked.
A lot of radioactive trash-threads bumping on /leftypol/ atm >>>/leftypol/695717 (misinfo) >>>/leftypol/693767 (doomer cringe) >>>/leftypol/695642 (low-effort bait from Reddit) >>>/leftypol/696402 (more Reddit shit, in thus case it should've gone into the /IG/ contaiment thread)
>>5377 >reddit shit <696402 Tell me did you read the post or just the meme image?
>>5378 Yes motherfucker. We've probably had five iterations of that exact thread in the past month, they're surely to be found in the catalog if you search 'reddit'. But to reiterate my main point: they all should've gone in the /IG/ thread we intentionally have for this topic to begin with, at most one 'Reddit censorship' cyclical should've been made, but it's already becoming old news at this point.
We've got a nazi in the 'Where Should People Live?' thread: >>>/leftypol/697202 >>>/leftypol/697287
>>5366 I DON'T KNOW HOW TO CODE BRO WTF I THOUGHT YOU MODS WERE SUPPOSED TO BE COMPUTER WHIZ NERDS WHO KNOW THIS STUFF
I hope you guys don't have servers in US with the "Red Scare about Antifa" president.
There's someone dropping fishy QR code links everywhere
>>5388 Thanks, took care of it.
Pol tards raid just happening, i suggest you to act swiftly
Those former /pol/uighurs who now feel like they need recognition from some boomers on /pol/ out of spite should have their shitty raid threads anchored so they dont shit up the board. Literally all of these threads end the same way which is with /pol/ spamming and raiding and making the site unusable because they outnumber us 100 to 1
>>5393 Seconding this.
>>5393 Jannies need to delete these threads outright.
>>>/leftypol/695717 This thread's OP is misinfo, please don't enable it. (It was revealed to be misinfo a couple of minutes in 24+ hours ago and just started bumping again).
>>5393 >end the same way which is with /pol/ spamming and raiding and making the site unusable because they outnumber us 100 to 1 Ecept that every time we raid and they TRY to raid back we BTFO out of them. I remember given that I took part in 2 such raids when leftypol moved back to bunkerchan. It was absolute chaos on /pol/ and when they tried to raid us back they failed so hard they abandoned the attempt. I've also never been part of /pol/ and am a relative oldfag of 8ch leftypol.
>>5320 Can you ban >>>/hobby/12399, this faggot is derailing the thread AGAIN by posting bai about "muh gun control" which A) has already been argued and finished, and thus is pointless B) thread OP specifically didn't want gun control discussion, and shitposts like that are just fucking derailing the thread and thus against site rules
Please ban or at least penalize the guy on /leftypol/ that Wojack-spams everywhere in response to criticism or mere dialogues. I'm pretty sure 99% of the Wojack-posts during the last week have been from a singular, emotional, 16 year old kid. He needs to learn to lurk more before going on polluting the board quite frankly.
If we are not getting any more boards, you guys could remove /roulette/, and add /dead/ and /anime/ to the top bar for more activity
>>5421 Space_ is in a heroin-induced coma in Bangladesh where he went to scam street children into investing "in strong stocks", but which actually went to fund his VR gaming addiction (he only plays Eroges banned outside of Japan). I think you understand why he hardly ever tends to this site anymore (it's a shame, really). I don't think he should keep getting away with it, but maybe that's just me...
/leftypol/ might be getting brigaded by some interest group. Sudden flood of religious threads and links to conservative news outlets
>>5423 I don't notice anything unusual. I only see three religious threads: >>>/leftypol/703541 >>>/leftypol/703591 >>>/leftypol/700529 And the OP pic of this: >>>/leftypol/702848 But thanks for the heads up, I'll try to keep an eye out.
/pol/ anti-black thread on GET: >>>/GET/102593
>>5425 I've already reported it via the report function. This is /leftypol/ moderation meta board, btw. namely, leftypol/hobby/tech/edu/games/anime Report it here instead: https://bunkerchan.xyz/GET/res/73417.html
/pol/ black hate thread on GET: >>>/GET/102593
>>5420 It's actually a script used by several users.
I know this is /leftypol/ mod thread but can /GET/ mods clean up their acts. reactionary shit stays up for weeks but a single post about idpol gets deleted immediately and entire threads get cut down because mods can't take shitposting in a nonserious thread, resulting in plenty of content being deleted. Example the Butts thread, just porn posting with some joking shit-talking between anons, yesterday there were 244 posts... today there are 219. Like what the flying fuck?
>>5407 Hello? Can we get mods on this? This shit is still up.
>>5430 I think that might have been an error with Zeke's new crawler bot. However as you say, we are not responsible for /GET/ mods, you would have more luck using the feedback thread on that board. >>5431 I am reluctant to mod someone for gun control discussion, seems like a sincerely held belief to me.
>>5432 M8 1) The OP specified that Gun control argument should NOT be in the thread 2) The argument on gun control still happened and is over, but this same anon keeps posting the same "muh gun control retard" while saging just to bait a reply Just do us a favor and delete it so that some anon doesn't happen to reply and continue the pointless shitshow and people can continue to talk about guns and not politics.
>>5407 Bumping for this
What's up with that wojak script that quotes a post a makes some wojak image out of it? It's getting spammed all over leftypol
>>>/leftypol/705139 Please remove the bumplock on this thread. This bumplock was totally unjustified.
>>5441 undone
>>5441 no, cringe poster
(1.98 MB ban.webm)
Update the /leftypol/ sticky with the Russia general >>652142 You can delete my question chain in this somewhat unrelated thread in response to this, as I got the info I asked for: >>707323
>>5445 done the former, i'll just leave the questions, they'll bump off eventually
>>5320 Mods please ban >>>/hobby/12503 They are disregarding a moderator warning post, Are calling for violence based on sectarian ideology and shitposting bad-faith strawman bait
>>5445 FYI for cross-board posts you do >>>/leftypol/652142 and >>>/leftypol/707323
>>5453 Delete their post as well, since its just worthless contrarianism dressed under a strawman of outrage for "le people" typical lib bullshit.
>>>/leftypol/708035 >Anchoring cause thread went to shit Yet another completely unjustified thread bumplocking. So even though the OP had a completely legitimate and relevant topic for discussion, we're not allowed to talk about it because someone didn't like it? And what's the remedy for this? Have the OP make another identical thread and wait for it to happen again? So every time a shitposter messes with a discussion you can just shut down the whole thing? Who's to say you weren't the one who messed with the discussion in the first place? Do you see the problem with this kind of reasoning?
>>5457 What do you propose?
(28.78 KB 557x579 delete this.jpg)
Can the following threads be deleted? They're either duplicate threads or straight up unnecessary >>>/hobby/12512 There are 2 music generals and 5 other genre-specific music threads >>>/hobby/12376 There is already the SCP thread and it's only alive because someone necrobumped it >>>/hobby/12412 No effort OP post. Reposted on a film thread >>>/hobby/12458 As said before there are several music threads already up There are 2 metal threads 2 general music threads a leftist music thread a cringe song thread and others >>>/hobby/11142 A thread that has been remade on >>>/anime/ and was first posted on hobby by mistake Also can the /hobby/ board please implement the rules mentioned in >>>/hobby/12451
>>5458 Delete the shitposts, ban the derailer for a couple of hours, you know, the things jannies are supposed to do.
>>5459 >There is already the SCP thread and it's only alive because someone necrobumped it SCPs and Creepypasta have firmly become two different things, having two threads is fine.
>>5508 Except 1 is used and established and the other is not. Besides creepy pasta stuff is already being posted in the SCP thread.
>>5459 Some new lazy duplicates >>>/12555/ is another Punk thread... with 0 content and a zero effort OP that is literally "Is dis leftist, hurrr?" Also a new pointless car upholstry thread that belongs in the recently made car thread >>>/hobby/12548
>>5508 1) Creepypasta thread was literally necrobumped with a literal "bump" post. 2) Creepy-pasta is posted in the SCP thread and it was already suggested to be made one big thread, since users and PPH is low on hobby already without more thread splitting. 3) Creepy pasta and SCP are not really that distinct, since more often than not (in recent times), creepy pasta is just made up shit... just like SCP.
>>5440 Is it actually a script? I thought it was a real person?
Is there a reason why empty reported threads are just bumplocked instead of just being deleted?
>>5521 >>5516 >>5440 Such a cringe thread. Why do people enable wojack fags? Like an occassional use is fitting but its just being spammed constantly in threads.
>>5522 For more transparency. So that people can see why they have been bumplocked and let them the possibility of contesting the decision.
>>5524 Then why was the original Last of Us thread deleted when the new duplicate thread stayed up!? Like what the fuck?
>>5525 https://bunkerchan.xyz/games/res/22628.html Not a single archive.is page for it either. 52 posts lost in return for a literal shitpost thread. Is this your shitty mod-bot at it again?
>>5527 https://bunkerchan.xyz/games/res/2628.html you added an extra 2 you sperg
Consider making a religious containment thread. I would really like to see them all share the same thread, I think it would be a glorious sight to behold.
You delete my shitposts but let a fucking nazi hold an AMA. >>/leftypol/714660 This is the last straw. Fuck you, you dumb weeaboo children.
>>5320 Requesting the Permaculture thread be moved to >>>/hobby/ Why: >>>/leftypol/716917 Thread: >>>/leftypol/161914
(61.26 KB 1080x432 Screenshot_20200725-040724~2.png)
>this is a post worth deleting from an idpol discussion thread according to jannies
>>5637 that post is uncontroversial, I don't see the problem
>>5637 this should not have been deleted
Whoever made the idpol discussion thread should be wholly ashamed of themselves if not wholly ejected from their duties.
Hey I got banned for idpol for arguing against people promoting anti-trans ideology but this image exists also I made a thread for it cause making threads despite site agreements seems to be the norm with the idpol discussion thread >>5643
>>5640 >do stuff without consulting the users >they complain and say we're tyrants >ask the board about stuff >they shit it up and piss and moan about it
>>5646 At this rate its probably because you have shit ideas more than how you half-assedly ask us how we would like you to implement your shit ideas.
(19.40 KB 624x351 alan partridge.jpg)
>>5647 What would you do to improve the board if you were me? Oh and you can't improve the software or the servers and you can't actually ban anyone because of Tor.
(2.86 MB 1242x1491 shot everyone here.png)
>>5648 if I knew I'd join the vols I can pretty firmly say an idpol board is about in the deepest levels of hell on my priority list though. Banning /IG/ might honestly be a start and replace it with like an e-celeb cringe thread or something so we don't have fucking retards simping for socdem breadtubers with edgy aesthetics. Probably more aggressively wordfilter rightist terms like tranny and the like. God knows there are probably retarded vols who'd rather ban everyone than have any persecution of the "left" reactionaries though, so odds are things will stay the same and I'd get stripped of power and/or banned. Like I am now.
(97.67 KB 1024x742 nkvd.jpg)
>>5649 I don't see how replacing IG with an identical IG would really change/fix anything though. As for word filters, well, there might be something coming up once the admins bother to get round to it, just wait :^)
>>5649 If i were a janny, I would simply increase my salary exponentially.
>>5650 well there are two options: 1. blanket ban on IG shit a la idpol 2. make (and enforce) a thread exclusively about IG topics but only for shitting on them at least option 2 means combating breatube and the like and there could be an "unofficial" policy of letting decent content (like prolekult, cockshott, ect) slide in their own threads while doing crackdowns on Maupin posters or whatever. It seems at least mildly more productive than a blanket ban, but the situation generally is deteriorating mostly because we've never really reconciled the underlying issues of the two different cultures formed from the split, now we just have the oldBO trogs shitting and farting up about trans people on /leftypol/ and everyone who gets kinda tired of it browsing /leftypol/ but gradually being pushed over to /GET/. All I can conclude is that events occur as it were, twice: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce. >As for word filters, well, there might be something coming up once the admins bother to get round to it, just wait :^) Lad I've heard that since the split. Hell, I fucking heard it with the old idpol general, I heard it when the idpol general spread to /leftytrash/, I heard it both from oldBO and post-coup BO. It's not easy to have faith in people you can't know. >>5651 Based.
>>5648 1. Remove the wojack script thread from >>>/tech/ and remove posts and 3-day ban anyone using it for a month. 2a. Remove names and trips for users; subject-line and flags are well enough 2b. Require names and position for staff as there's a power differential, when you exercise authority you are required to give a sentence as to why you exercised it. 3. Stop bumplocking shit that's just blatant rule-breaking and just remove it instead, as it clutters the board unnecessarily. 4. Make an /idealism general/ to contain Grace-poster, fascists trolls, IDpollers, socdems, religious revisionists and post-leftists (remove /dead/; it's reactionary).
>>5653 And with #4 I'm of course saying you should repress these activities outside the container-thread.
also - filter reactionary language aggressively - if individuals will not be banned, their threads can be. deprive them of space to post, make a bot for referrals based on keywords to alert mods if common reactionary topics come up so they can be banned quicker, and do the same for common /pol/ images and infographics - actually establish a community relationship with the posters on the ground by wearing your trips and badges openly - shift anti-idpol to solely anti-right wing idpol - centralize an organization thread, it doesn't need a specific topic or objective, it can just be a list of ongoing projects people can chip into if they have free time. literally anything but having everyone shitfight all the time with each other, cause thats all we do anymore. - start banning people for posting shit like "le reddib" and other secret club elitist shit - have a more comprehensive community plan for shit, like an actual roadmap for community goals and/or objectives, formalize the book thread into proper guide to self-radicalizing and how to do online and irl organizing rather than just a giant pile of books without context. - while you are at it, also a repository where the books are sorted better too. hell, stuff like the banbot is already a project on /GET/, seriously. Collaborate with /GET/ mods, they have stuff like the community engagement and other aspects down already, and /GET/ has a lot less fucking bellyaching than /leftypol/.
and of course: the only reason why right wingers espouse these types of views on leftypol like being incels or what have you is because they not only find affirmation in each other on the site but because they figure there are enough morons here that they can make an appeal to some of them. to an extent it is the duty of experienced leftists to refute them where possible and for less experienced leftists to learn from these engagements and from other works to not have that vulnerability. blanket bans like idpol only worked in the short term because they smothered the ability to talk about it for a time before they wriggled back into /IG/. The only way to be rid of them is if they are not only systematically persecuted, but loathed and derided by the community at large, made unwelcome at all turns, met with a bayonet beyond every street corner. To some extent we will likely need to warn people who veer too close with agreeing with reactionaries and, if they keep feeding the trolls, give them short bans. But that is if, and only if, the mods likewise keep up a solid campaign of bans and thread delets.
>>5655 >filter reactionary language aggressively Fuck off >shift anti-idpol to solely anti-right wing idpol <Don't critisize muh liberal agenda!!! All idpol is shit. >start banning people for posting shit like "le reddib" and other secret club elitist shit t.redditor doesn't want to be called out GET's banbot erased several threads and posts for no reason.
>>5648 Repostan my suggestions here for completeness sake and more attention points Find space and kick the piss out of him Really, ban /IG/ and don't let a replacement develop, aggresively filter for reactionary buzzwords, start nipping idpol conversations in the bud as soon as it becomes obvious its someone trolling or pushing reactionary viewpoints on any topic rather than actuall debating or just being wrong about something, instead of letting them fester until someone says something outright inflamattory or it ruins the entire thread its in which from the outside at least appears to be the current effective policy, switch on poster id's as necessary so people realise how many people there are actually doing this nonsense Obviously there are ways around ids and bans, but oxygen thieves need oxygen to function, if they get smacked down everytime they start nonsense they'll move onto a softer target where they have more leeway to get attention
https://bunkerchan.xyz/leftypol/res/697419.html why was this thread bumplocked. I'm reading capital now and it's useful to me
>>5657 >GET's banbot erased several threads and posts for no reason. Not our department, you have to complain to them
jannies shouldn't be able to post without being identified as jannies
>>5659 >why It seems someone had an allergic reaction to the mudpie bs. I have undone it. >>5655 I mean most of this is desirable but it isn't very easy. >/GET/ has a lot less fucking bellyaching than /leftypol/ This is because /GET/ is smaller and people that want to shit up the place seem to almost always go to /leftypol/ as a consequence. Just compare the length of the logs of each board. >Collaborate with /GET/ mods We do but most things are just independent and the two boards are very different. >>5661 Who would be left to do the jannying then? If I had to choose I for one would rather post than trying to keep the wheels from falling off.
>>5662 you could still post, but people would know that it was a janny posting. why would that stop you from posting?
>>5663 Cause I don't want to be identifiable and I don't want to have a name or wear a badge. That is kinda the point of anon imageboards.
>>5664 you would not be identifiable beyond being identifiable as a janny. which is a kind of badge, but then again you do have policing powers
>>5665 Whether that's a big deal or not I am just saying in that hypothetical I would prefer to go back to being anon and most likely would quit the cleaning job. I also fail to see the benefit of it. What would happen is that threads that have a mod posting in them would get derailed by that and the anti-janny faction. In any case the point is quite moot as we can't even ban people from posting if they put just a bit of effort into evading we certainly can't make anyone wear a badge.
>>5320 There is no post about how to browse the site on mobile apps? Is there any ways?
Add Southeast Asia General to FAQ sticky (and make the thread cyclical): >>>/leftypol/705255
>>5668 Dashchan
>>5637 So no vol will give me an explanation? I'm still waiting.
>>5673 The vol who deleted your post is not yet online, I sent him message about that.
>>5674 Alright, thanks m8
>>5667 >I also fail to see the benefit of it. you fail to see the benefit of knowing that you're arguing with someone who will ban you for disagreeing with their pet peeve? >no jannies would never do that! haha
>>5637 It was friendly fire on my part; among the shitstorm caused by the multiple wreckers we had to deal with in that thread I deleted your post without any precaution and with too much haste as to read it properly. From reading it here I see there was no reason to delete this post, I apologize on my part.
>>5672 cant find on playstore or fdroid is it gone?
>>5681 First install Dashchan from Mishiranu/Dashchan on GitHub. Also look for the webm extention. Then install the Bunkerchan extention from maksrago/Dashchan-Extensions-ACF on GitHub >>5678 I accept your apology.
>>5660 I'm not complaining, just pointing out that a bot that "targets reactionrray words and images" is not only utter censorship but also can be abused quite easily. Old BO's bans will look like a dream. For example the debunk thread would be erased because "it has reactionary words" even though its part of a query for responses to reactionary arguments and strawmen.
>>5655 /GET/ is a fucking hugbox with a nearly closed circuit of users and very liberal views. Its a literal shitposting board that does not engage in political discussion and actively bans such content.
>>5650 Please no. Uighur is already cringey as fuck and /GET/'s wordfilters make it nearly incomprehensible.
>>5637 Because its fucking intersectional bullshit that is not dialectical or socialist. ALL idpol is a distraction. Most REAL issues of race or sex will be resolved with worker emancipation. The rest ought to be resolved after a revolution, when they actually matter. You deserve this fucking deletion because its fucking bad faith spam that you keep reposting endlessly.
Can you remove the first bumper from /leftypol/? I think it aged terribly considering who was behind the Bolivian coup. I made these other two if you need a replacement or want to add more bumpers since the ones we have are already pretty old.
>>5682 Thanks.
>>5687 The one with Chavez and Che is really good, greatjob on making these anon.
>>5687 >I think it aged terribly considering who was behind the Bolivian coup. ...the pope?
>>5683 ...We have nothing to do with the bot, you have to talk to /GET/ about it.
(1.25 MB 900x1864 ussr-tan.png)
>>>/leftypol/719189 should be moved to hobby. Its low in posts, is sinking and the topic is >>>/hobby/ content (soviet cartoons/film) with little political discussion involved.
>>5691 FFS m8, can you scroll up? Anon made a post about how leftypol should have a bot for removing "reactionary text and images" which I argued against, since that is harmful to discussion (since quoting reactionary arguments to debunk them would result in a ban). I then brought up the unreliability of /GET/'s recent bot as an example. I never claimed that /leftypol/ mods were responsible.
>>5690 USA backed Christian reactionaries
>>5693 Okay, fair enough, my bad.
>>5693 >>5695 lel you morons you didn't even read the post itself which was the bot could be used for referrals to ban people based on keywords, basically an auto-report system
>>5696 I did read the post and that is the specific problem. using such words (which are left undefined) even in ironic context or when quoting a reactionary for reference, would get you a ban for no reason.
>>5698 The bot would flag the post for manual review by a human being, if anything it would reduce false positives by regularising the review process instead of jannies going into threads and manually scanning for shit and having to read grating, stupid conversations
>>5699 > instead of jannies going into threads and manually scanning for shit and having to read grating, stupid conversations Except this wouldn't help at all. 1) The jannies would still have to read through the exchange to determine whether the supposedly reactionary word was truly reactionary 2) It would enforce one ideology, since anyone who isn't agreeing with the mainstream but arguing in good faith could get banned by mods who themselves are biased. Report systems exist for a reason.
Oh hey, it's me Douglas Lain again I just wanted to tell you that you did a good work by deleting the popeposter from the obvious bait thread made by /pol/. that was really important thing to do, nothing is more annoying than spammers in /pol/yp bait threads. Thanks for your moderation style, mongoloids >>720493
>>5703 >>/leftypol/720493
>>>/leftypol/720493 is a /pol/ bait
>>>/leftypol/721080 another /pol/ bait thread wtf are you doin mods?
Why aren't you dealing with the wojak script
Few days back I was unable to post while away from home and using mobile data because my ip "was recognized as a known spammer". I assume at some point lewd cat poster used it through vpn. If I ever encounter such situation, how do I get it unbaned?
/leftybritpol/ is once again filling up with /pol/yp bait and infographics
>>5725 Get in the riot chat and ping a mod so we can help you.
We seems to be getting raided by /pol/ again (/IG/, /leftypol/ catalog)
and QTDDTOT
Is there an audio filetype that's allowed on this site? I was gonna post some music that isn't on youtube or anywhere else but it doesn't seem to allow any audio
>>5741 On >>>/GET/ at least one can post .mp3's
Big thanks to the based mod active right now.
>Someone get rid of this power-tripping mod who's accusing me of "ban evasion" with zero proof and considers pornographers not to be petite bourgeois. I immediately undid the ban, because I realized later you were not ban evading and the ban was too harsh for simply contributing to the cancer.
>>5761 Classifying labor and exchange relations in prostitution and pornography industry with Marxist terms is not contributing to any "cancer" especially when citing academic resources such as http://uregina.ca/~gingrich/s28f99.htm. If you don't like the discussion, hide the thread and go outside walking in a park or something. Don't be a powertripper who bans people randomly with false accusations.
>>5765 >go outside walking in a park or something I'm about to do literally that. I undid the ban. What more do you want. The anti-sex work shit is irrelevant to /ig/. >hide the thread I'm a vol, I can't do that. I have to monitor the extremely shit /ig/ thread at the cost of my mental health. >Don't be a powertripper who bans people randomly with false accusations. Cry me a fucking river, you probably don't even know for how long the ban was since it was revoked so quickly.
(131.71 KB 1875x855 Screenshot_20200728_222328.png)
Reposted from /leftypol/
>>5767 You could've just said "no sex work discussion on /ig/ from here on" and that would've been the end of that. Instead you decide to ban me with false accusations such as "ban evasion" and now you're gaslighting me on /leftypol/ claiming that I'm ban evading again ( >>>/leftypol/726743 ).
Nice job for deleting all of your posts that incriminated you. This site is beyond repair.
>>5772 What do you want? I already removed you ban, instantly. Nobody would know this, except you complained about it, so this doesn't "serve" me in any way.
>>5774 >>5775 I'm not deleting shit, other mods are doing that and posted the evidence here >>5770
>>5767 >The anti-sex work shit is irrelevant to /ig/ >please avoid spontaneous marxist discussion and keep to the topic of the subreddit You're beyond parody and have no clue how to run a chan You have no business being a moderator Go back
>>5779 apply as a mod then, lil bitch.
>>5781 Alright consider this my application I apply as a mod on the condition that I replace this janny as mod
>>5782 >personal vendetta you're not fit as a mod. You're beyond parody and have no clue how to run a chan You have no business being a moderator Go back
(583.26 KB 1080x1331 truechad.png)
>>5785 >personal vendetta Why yes I do have a personal vendetta against the ignorant I vow to strike down all those who cannot withstand theory
>>5786 Spending half your day watching e-celebs on youtube (and the other half shitposting on /IG/) doesn't count as theory.
>>5787 Woah are you engaging in a personal vendetta now? Well thank you for displaying to the world your incapability at being a moderator I petition this janny's immediate removal
>>5788 I was just making an observation as you seemed quite mistaken on what counts as theory. I care as much about you as I care about your favourite e-celebs.
>>5789 >I was just making an observation as you seemed quite mistaken on what counts as theory. I doubt your ability to even recognize theory tbh Stand by comrade rowling :)
1. Apologize for your ban evasion accusation. 2. Apologize for being too trigger-happy with bans. 3. Apologize for gaslighting me on /leftypol/ about ban evasion again after unbanning me. 4. Stop acting like a 12-year-old and arguing with this random dude here ( >>5781 >>5782 >>5785 etc.). 5. You should not be allowed to moderate anything other deleting the most obvious Nazi/porn/gore spamming. You don't seem to have the mental capacity to discern more nuanced discussions and make a judgment over what's too "idpol" (extremely broad and vague term).
>>5792 >1. Apologize for your ban evasion accusation. no >2. Apologize for being too trigger-happy with bans. no >3. Apologize for gaslighting me on /leftypol/ about ban evasion again after unbanning me. no 4. Stop acting like a 12-year-old and arguing with this random dude here ( >>5781 >>5782 >>5785 etc.). *checks links* no >5. You should not be allowed to moderate anything other deleting the most obvious Nazi/porn/gore spamming. You don't seem to have the mental capacity to discern more nuanced discussions and make a judgment over what's too "idpol" (extremely broad and vague term). thanks for your input.
>>5795 Then if the staff in this site have any sense, you should be removed.
>>5795 The fact that you banned this dude for posting a class analysis means you are not fit to be a mod. Maybe go mod for r/socialism instead. They love onlyfans ethots there and would give their entire paychecks to one.
>>5795 >tfw nothing will come about after this janny sperged out the whole staff is a joke
(285.56 KB 763x1975 (you).png)
Please move this thread to >>>/edu/ OP approves >>>/leftypol/724981
The /leftypol/ humor thread (which is currently sinking and slow) is more of a >>>/hobby/ thread than a /leftypol/ one, given the nature of its content being humor and collected humorous chanology. Requesting it be moved >>>/leftypol/622870
>>5800 The mod team is a clique, they just jack each other off in chats, posting OwO and being all kawaii to one another. It's retarded as fuck. They don't care about communism, or Marxism, because noneof them are communists or Marxists, they're self-professed socdems and radlibs. They'll claim 1 communist and 1 anarchist on the mod team, like the white dude who points to his one black friend.
(96.25 KB 890x656 so stupid.jpg)
>>5837 >The mod team is a clique, they just jack each other off in chats Not only is everything in this post a lie, logically there is no way you could know this was happening. Who are you trying to convince here, the clinically retarded? >they're self-professed socdems and radlibs. They'll claim 1 communist and 1 anarchist on the mod team Oh fucking hell, if one of us stated something so absurd I am sure you can produce proof. It would be the talk of the town for a year straight had this fantasy happened. Explain to me why anyone would put up with this shit if they weren't at the very least an anarchist? If I wasn't a communist but a socdem I would have left you to your own devices eons ago.
So was the wojak script banned or not
>>5841 Power move
(7.25 KB 463x108 Capture.PNG)
>banned in 10 minutes for ironic racism >the same thing said unironically for a full day isn't banned Should I keep the racism unironic next time to avoid a ban? Or is racism only banned between certain hours?
>>5848 Why is this site becoming tumblr?
WHY was this thread locked for idpol? >>>/leftypol/728766 No idpol here
Mod team is being extra reddit lately
>>5848 I evaded the ban but the board is such a shithole I don't see any point wasting time on it. Kill yourself jannies.
Thanks for deleting my question in the QTDDTOT thread. My question was "How does /leftypol/ explain the subversion by Jews?" I want to challenge what i know about the Jews, tell me how i should write the question so i doesn't get deleted? Do you want me to censor the word jew or something?
>>5853 I see now that it was deleted because it was idpol, is there a place where i can ask my question, like an idpol thread? I have a feeling i'm not the only person to have similar questions about the jews and /leftypol/'s take on them.
Let's have a thread where we can post things that don't deserve their own thread, beyond questions. Kind of like, "feels that don't deserve their own thread" or something.
>>5854 >>5853 We have these threads all the time. Usually the OP is in bad faith. You can ask for resources that debunk "the subversion by Jews" and read them on your own. Did you check the catalog? >>5855 A better thread for that is /leftytrash/ located here: >>>/GET/102302 If you have a specific idea of the OP, you could paste it here + OP image and I can ask the other mods for approval so it doesn't get bumplocked.
>>5854 Also check this thread. >>>/leftypol/643776
>>5856 Thank you very much. >>5857 That's exactly what i was looking for, thanks!
(958.21 KB 1280x1110 84098120.png)
>>5653 >>5654 >4. Make an /idealism general/ to contain Grace-poster >And with #4 I'm of course saying you should repress these activities outside the container-thread. I am not so bad, am I?
>>5861 No, not really, they're just assblasted
>>5861 Yes you are, you goddamn ingenious PSYOP bitch.
>>5849 Because too many reddit snowflakes have immigrated here.
Mods has the report function been fixed?
You ask for feedback in the idpol statement thread, but then you lock the thread. Smh, this is why people don't like you. Here's my post anyway: >>727234 >We believe that conflicts between genders, races, sexualities, and so on are distractions from the wider class struggle that are intentionally fanned by the ruling class. <This does not mean that oppression based on personal characteristics does not exist, That's exactly what the statement means. If the conflicts are a "distraction" then they are a manufactured narrative, rather than a material reality. <but that it should be approached from an egalitarian perspective What does that mean to you, "from an egalitarian perspective"? <which is not personally accusatory and does not assign ‘victim’ and ‘oppressor’ groups. You just said oppression happens. If oppression happens, that means there's someone doing the oppressing and someone being oppressed. The groups don't necessarily have to be "white", "black", whatever, but there are oppressor groups and oppressed group. For example, the private military firms operating in MENA are oppressor groups linked to other oppression groups, and they oppress a group of people. The problem here is of group definition. Someone joining the nazi party is literally making a decision to join a group whose stated aim is to oppress others. I guess what you wanted to say is that you don't think people should be grouped by immutable characteristics, but rather by their class position and material conditions.
This thread should be moved to >>>/dead/ : >>>/leftypol/726175
>>5795 Wow you are a fucking faggot an ruining this board
Jannies do your jobs and delete the incel thread that has been up for far to long.
>>5962 Did you read the idpol thread OP? They were staying active for 24 hours then it was crackdown time. >If the conflicts are a "distraction" then they are a manufactured narrative, rather than a material reality. 1) The point of that concession was to ease any newfags who would want to talk about women and race issues. 2) These issues exist currently - though exaggerated by liberals - however they are distractions from the unified and real struggle which in and of itself would solve these issues. There is no dichotomy >What does that mean to you, "from an egalitarian perspective"? What is meant is that (for example) african American minorities would be given social justice as per their position, HOWEVER it would not be at the cost of others as it is done under capitalism and it would make them socially equal to others not above, as seems to be the dogma of recent radical liberals >If oppression happens, that means there's someone doing the oppressing and someone being oppressed Re-read the sentence. They speak of GROUPS in plural. The implication is that the current liberal ideologies focus on various "oppressors" (le pateriarchy or le whitey) and this is false. The only actual oppressor is Porky and the only 'victims' that exist are the workers, regardless of their race or sex. >he private military firms operating in MENA are oppressor groups linked to other oppression groups, and they oppress a group of people. They are not oppressor groups, they are tools of poky and symptoms of their system.
>>5958 Seems so. It's fickle. >>5962 It was closed because the thread stopped serving it's purpose after the first 100 posts out of probably 3,000+. >>5965 You have no idea what I do or don't do on this board, child. Pure hysteria. >>5980 I assume it was already deleted. It's easier to check if you link the thread.
>>5838 >>The mod team is a clique, they just jack each other off in chats >Not only is everything in this post a lie, No, 100% true >logically there is no way you could know this was happening. I've spent time in the IRC channel. One of your jannies is a looney tunes alt-righter.
>>5983 >You have no idea what I do or don't do on this board, child. Pure hysteria. You have the same snide dismissal of criticism, as well as that stupid ass smugness. And all the anons are intimately familiar with the actions of the mods. Please stop acting like what you do it a big mystery.
>>5984 The IRC is not part of the leftypol mod team and most, if not all mods, don't participate in it. >>5985 >all the anons are intimately familiar with the actions of the mods. See the post above you.
>>5983 >It was closed because the thread stopped serving it's purpose after the first 100 posts out of probably 3,000+. No, it was closed because people pushed back against the boards philosophical justification for being against idpol, that racism is a legitimate grievance that the left should recognize. You got butt mad when the board's gross racism was revealed when they had to actually defend these positions. The racist justifications for deeming racism an illegitimate grievance range from: Race doesn't exist Racism doesn't exist, only class. (lol) Racism isn't that bad. Slavery wasn't the profitable, or that bad because slaves were expense and therefore weren't abused that much. Racism will be solved when the glorious revolution comes, date TBD. When your anti-idpol defenders started gettting BTFO'd you all locked the thread.
>>5986 >The IRC is not part of the leftypol mod team and most, if not all mods, don't participate in it. Yes it was a part of the mod team. Mods were in it and it used to be linked at the top of /leftypol/. Stop lying janny
>>5986 >>all the anons are intimately familiar with the actions of the mods. >See the post above you. Which post, idiot.
>>5987 *that racism ISN'T a legitimate grievance that the left should recognize.
>>5988 Anon, I don't want to say "just believe me" so seriously, go in the IRC and tell me which mods are there. Who moderates the IRC? Who are its members? Which members are part of the leftypol mod roster? >>5987 >When idiots start shitting up the thread with their shitty idpol or vulgar class reductionism, you closed the thread. Well, yes. I wrote this and with help of other anons refined it. It was scrapped because the language and terminology was too dense for the average lurker, newcommer, theorylet, redditor, etc to understand. Like it or not, vulgar class-reductionism is easier to understand why we don't want idpol (besides the fact that it derails any productive conversation) even if it removes all nuance. Any definition of identity politics will undoubtedly have things to criticize, that is the nature of leftist discourse. >Identity politics essentializes identity without regards to the material relations underpinning it. At best, it assimilates identities within the realm of discourse and media (not economic autonomy and security!); at worst it incites intra-class conflicts. >As leftists, we fight for the free determination of all individuals and their full emancipation from oppressive power structures. The rights of individuals to live according to their own wishes is a fundamental part of leftism. >It is for this reason that identity struggles are a particular manifestation of class struggle and identity politics as such is the neoliberal recuperation of particular class struggles at the expense of the whole class struggle, and hence, essentially conservative. Being against identity politics does not mean that oppression based on personal characteristics does not exist, but rather that fighting for the emancipation of individual identities without a class character ultimately amounts to fighting for individual emancipation, rather than emancipating the group as a whole. >Instead, we advocate for the political organization of communities of communities on the grounds of class analysis, class solidarity, to achieve political gains and protection now, with the ultimate goal of full emancipation of all the working class.
>>5992 >Anon, I don't want to say "just believe me" so seriously, go in the IRC and tell me which mods are there. Who moderates the IRC? Who are its members? Which members are part of the leftypol mod roster? Nibba, I'm not doing that. The mods are there, the mods here have stated on this board they frequent the channel. And the channel is endorsed by this board as being "the mod channel". >Like it or not, vulgar class-reductionism is easier to understand why we don't want idpol (besides the fact that it derails any productive conversation) even if it removes all nuance. Do you understand what "vulgar" means? It means wrong, un-Marxist. OF COURSE IT'S EASIER TO UNDERSTAND THINGS THAT ARE WRONG AND PANDER TO YOUR WHITE SPOOKS. >Identity politics essentializes identity without regards to the material relations underpinning it. At best, it assimilates identities within the realm of discourse and media (not economic autonomy and security!); at worst it incites intra-class conflicts. Dude you assert this with zero fucking justifications. And this is why you ban "idpol". Your justifications are indefensible. They're all strawman or gross racists /pol/ ephemera. >As leftists, we fight for the free determination of all individuals and their full emancipation from oppressive power structures. The rights of individuals to live according to their own wishes is a fundamental part of leftism. This board doesn't do any fighting. Talk about unwarranted self importance. An no, you don't fight for "emancipation from oppressive power structures" because you obfuscate shit like racism by denying it exists. Obfuscating exploitation upholds it. >It is for this reason that identity struggles are a particular manifestation of class struggle and identity politics as such is the neoliberal recuperation of particular class struggles at the expense of the whole class struggle, and hence, essentially conservative. Holy historical revisionism batman! Racism long predates "neoliberalism" which itself is a bullshit term. You have SJW boogymen codified into your boards policies HAHAHAHAHA might as well throw Jews in there too. >Instead, we advocate for the political organization of communities of communities on the grounds of class analysis, class solidarity, to achieve political gains and protection now, with the ultimate goal of full emancipation of all the working class. Superstructure shapes the base booklet. You can't talk about one without the other. Might as well try to have a conversation about where babies come from without mentioning sex.
>>5992 >Copied leftypol's idpol policy, as if leftypol has any legitimacy. Please stop, your stupid ass board can't even get along with other leftist websites. You're not some crusader that has the "real right answer" about idpol. You're a troglodyte loner with an ideology so bankrupt it only appeals to several hundred of your sycophants in the entire internet.
>>5993 >IRC I don't know what to tell you. Are you confusing it with the matrix chat? I've never been more than 5 minutes in the IRC. The IRC was inhabited by old bunkerchan mods that were displaced when the leftypol community migrated here. They haven't modded here in a long time except for that rogue mod that was discovered and ousted (the pyongyang event). It was there for historic reasons, but we petitioned for its removal precisely because it is inhabited by reactionaries. >[Your response to the idpol definition] <It was scrapped because the language and terminology was too dense for the average lurker, newcommer, theorylet, redditor, etc to understand. Thanks for proving the point. >>5994 >>Copied leftypol's idpol policy I didn't do that, this isn't leftypol's idpol policy. Did you even read or do you lack basic reading comprehension skills? >your stupid ass board can't even get along with other leftist websites ok? We do have positive relations with other leftist websites and communities. A lot of our members are members of other communities. >You're not some crusader that has the "real right answer" about idpol. And when did I say that? I said "Any definition of identity politics will undoubtedly have things to criticize, that is the nature of leftist discourse". How is that "having the right answer", idiot. >You're a troglodyte loner with an ideology so bankrupt it only appeals to several hundred of your sycophants in the entire internet. I am very social and outgoing, and have many close friends. My local communist org in which I am very active (and hold leadership positions in) has similar sympathies. They call liberal idpol "crack", "meth", "carbohydrates", meaning that it has no substance and produces a high that isn't productive. Any serious communist that organizes (at least locally) knows that idpol people and orgs do no serious organizing work and are usually toxic and disruptive to activities. Cool personal attacks though. Keep crying.
>>5987 > anti-idpol defenders started getting BTFO'd Nobody got BTFOed except liberals like you. You morons were just arguing in circles, and kept returning to the same bullshit questions that were already answered. I.E. Bad Faith Argument. >Racism isn't that bad Nobody said that. People were stating that racism today is not as bad as liberals make it out to be, mostly because porky propagandizes this to create rifts in the working class >Slavery wasn't the profitable By the time of the Civil War, they weren't profitable because socio-economic development does not stop and at some point chattel slavery ceases to function efficiently. That is an objective unemotional analysis from an economic perspective. >or that bad because slaves were expense and therefore weren't abused that much Nobody said that. The point was different, they wouldn't unnecessarily kill slaves because of loss of property is important to capitalists. >Race doesn't exist There is no biological basis for race. Superficial phenotypical differences are related to environmental adaptation and does not mean anything except variation in global population diversity. >Racism doesn't exist, only class Nobody said that at all you nutbag. The statement was that only class matters to socialist struggle and that anything else is a distraction that A) would be solved by or after socialist revolution Or B) Was pure attentionwhoring. >People pushed back a small group of spammers bitching about "crackers" and "muh racism" is not the people. Most people told you to fuck off, repeatedly.
>>5995 >I've never been more than 5 minutes in the IRC. Well I have. >The IRC was inhabited by old bunkerchan mods that were displaced when the leftypol community migrated here. Oh so now we go from, there was no leftypol IRC, to there is on but it only had old mods. I thought you never spent more than 5 minutes in there, how can you be such an expert on whether there were mods. And I'm not talking about matrix. You all had an IRC room linked on the front page. <It was scrapped because the language and terminology was too dense for the average lurker, newcommer, theorylet, redditor, etc to understand. >Thanks for proving the point. I don't see how, I understand your definition of idpol perfectly. It's mostly racist navel gazing about the existential threat SJWs pose. >ok? It means no other left org buys into your crypto fash bullshit. >We do have positive relations with other leftist websites and communities. LMAO, no you don't. Name one other org that publicly endorses leftypol. >You're not some crusader that has the "real right answer" about idpol. >And when did I say that? You guys fucking say it every day. Don't play stupid. >Cool personal attacks though. Keep crying. No one gives a fuck if you have friends. Fucking Nazis have friends, family, children etc. It's not proof that your not actually a racist crypto fash butt hurt spooked white boi, especially online. And thanks I will cry more. Wow, how embarrassing, I take shit like black men having their throat stepped on my police. >>5998 >Nobody got BTFOed except liberals like you. Oh, is that why you shut down the tread and cry about idpol every goddamn day. >Racism isn't that bad >Nobody said that. Plenty of people said that. >By the time of the Civil War, they weren't profitable because socio-economic development does not stop and at some point chattel slavery ceases to function efficiently. That is an objective unemotional analysis from an economic perspective. Lol, is that why it took a 4 year long civil war that required the destruction of every piece of capital the south had. Yes, so unprofitable. It was only oneo of the largest economic engines in the entire world before the Civil War. >or that bad because slaves were expense and therefore weren't abused that much >Nobody said that. YES PEOPLE SAID THAT And there was no significant push back from anyone but a lone social democrat of all fucking people. And that kind of racist bullshit I see often here, with no push back from the community. But you'll come out of the wood work for incels and Sakai posters. >Race doesn't exist >There is no biological basis for race. Nice strawman, you know goddamn well people mean race as a social construct. Not the /pol/ definition of race, which as someone who frequents /pol/, your intimately familiar with. >Racism doesn't exist, only class >Nobody said that at all you nutbag. Bullshit again, yes people do say that. >a small group of spammers bitching about "crackers" and "muh racism" is not the people. They said a lot more than that, but since your white spooks got bruised that's all you could see during your tantrum.
>>5999 *Wow, how embarrassing, I take shit like black men having their throat stepped on my police seriously.
>>5999 You need to improve your reading comprehension. Also lurk more and read. leftypol community vols =/= bunkerchan's old mods. >how can you be such an expert on whether there were mods in the IRC I am a vol you stupid fuck. >your [] actually a racist crypto fash butt hurt spooked white boi (sic) Lol, you keep trying to describe me and can't stop failing. Are there essential characteristics of "white bois" that I am demonstrating? Sounds awfully racist of your part. Please go be racist elsewhere.
Could you please delete my thread? >>13447
>>6003 Done. You can link between board like this: >>>/hobby/13440
>>6004 Thank you very much.
>>6001 >muh pithy dismissal Stunning retort, truly a philosopher king. >Are there essential characteristics of "white bois" that I am demonstrating? Not many people besides white guys that have /pol/ tier meltdowns over idpol. >Please go be racist elsewhere. LMAO, this from a representative of a board that debates whether racism even really exists because there's pour white people.
Why is recurring namefag literalNadzee tolerated? He very obviously isn't here to "debate" or because he's considering switching sides or whatever technicality in the rules he claims to stick around, he literally just spams reactionary propaganda in every thread he's in
>>6015 They aren't tolerated. They're evading bans and spamming threads
>>6015 We do our best, he/she is not tolerated. They have severe delusions and twitter addictions.
>>5982 >What is meant is that (for example) african American minorities would be given social justice as per their position, This already happens, but conservatives/reactionaries perceive it as a demotion of their own position. Conservatives like Jordan Peterson see the Civil Rights Act as a bad move, so any kind of help/social justice reform will be seen as non-egalitarian help. No one is bringing down "white people" to boost "black people", no one takes reparations seriously and reparations will never happen. >HOWEVER it would not be at the cost of others as it is done under capitalism If you're helping someone, it is by definition at the cost of others. >and it would make them socially equal to others not above, as seems to be the dogma of recent radical liberals I think that's only the loudest part of the vocal radlib minority. >They are not oppressor groups, they are tools of poky and symptoms of their system. Private military companies are not tools of the state like regular armies, they are porkies in their own right; they provide a service and their workers/soldiers are exploited. They have no nation or loyalty to anything other than profit, any nation can hire them, and if their position as mercenaries became precarious, they always have the option of taking over some region in MENA and lording over it like other militias and warlords in the region.
Why did I get banned for trolling? When i didn't write a single troll post
>>6018 >>6017 I'm sorry, I just noticed him for the first time in a while the other day and didn't notice the number in the thousands in his name
>>6018 >We do our best, he/she is not tolerated. Bullshit, if that were the case you'd delete his posts instantly just like you do with anyone you think is posting "idpol".
>>6030 Have you ever stopped to think that you don't see all of his posts because they are already deleted? >>6023 Do you use a shared IP? What is your ban id? Did you appeal the ban? What was the post you were banned for? >>6027 They are relentless, unfortunately. The best you can do as a user is not respond, not even disparagingly.
Why the hell ha this site become so pro idpol? On old 8leftypol you could sling the terms tranny, trap. troon everywhere and if you even thought you could post anything about trans rights you would be written off as b8 as you should, The same thing applies to feminist and PoC idpol, you would be instabanned if you ever used white as an insult. Here there are unironic discussions about racial hierarchies and white is slung everywhere to anyone who disagrees. This type of behavior is now encouraged and has been shown to be with that jannie who banned a person for saying girls with onlyfans accounts are petit-bourgeois. This is supposed to be a haven for anti idpol leftists who put class first, but instead the mods are welcoming redditors and twitter sjws with open arms.
>>6042 slurs are idpol in the other direction, fag.
>>6043 Only when genuinely used to express hatred pr violence towards the group they represent. Using them as jokes or irony pr just to insult someone online isn't idpol.
>>6042 >Why can't I say troon why are mods so triggered >Why are these people not insta banned for using white as an insult Ok Cumskin
>>6045 Ok strawman
(32.15 KB 229x361 depressed ghi.png)
>>5826 >>5825 Excuse me but if everyone is done complaining about idpol being banned can the Admins please move these threads?
>>>/leftypol/736037 >>>/leftypol/736039 Posting these here because the mod disappeared after they were posted. Continue to ignore the warnings at your own risk, if you even care about what you're being warned about.
>>6048 Continuing to argue with idiots is to be a bigger idiot, that's the moderators' approach
why did I get banned for 3 days for “blogposting” and ”bait”
>>6056 what did you post? be sure to tell the truth because I have no way of knowing if you're lying
>>6049 Everyone is stupid but the jannies, we have the outstanding quality of the board as a testament to our mods titanic intellect
>>6056 Were u the guy I had a discussion with about BPD thots? If so thats a stupid ban. Internet general is supposed to be for complaing about thots and e celebs. Most female leftist ecelebs have BPD so we should be able to shitpost about BPD thots. Fuck you mods.
hey retards, we are getting raided by pol >>>/leftypol/737455 and a lot of the posts in >>>/leftypol/735441
>>6064 yeah. We were talking about BPD and I shared an anecdote about my experience with a BPD woman
>>6066 Mods are trans
>>6063 The board could be a hell of a lot worse. Certainly not as bad as any 4chan board, most 8chan boards or any subreddit, so that's certainly something.
(120.02 KB 1277x333 bookchin on idpol.png)
>>5320 Unban >>>/leftypol/738023 How is this shit a ban able offense? It’s something that actually happened, and made a point about the identitarian nature of the protests/riots. Or are you implying >how dare anyone criticize the favorite lumpen anarkiddie-black supremacist performance art LARPing!?
Where is the meta thread?
>>6071 you're in it
>>>/leftypol/737914 derailed thread, now they are talking about radiation and 5G or some shit
>>6083 Cry harder, it's relevant to the OP
Have you guys even noticed that banning doesn't work? You can still post after getting banned.
>>6044 this was always ridiculous cope come up with by imageboard users trying to defend terminology adopted because it was funny to 13 year olds.
>>6090 You don't belong here. Back to twitter.
>idpol bad <allows a thread full of serb nationalist propaganda >>>/leftypol/738633 Nuke that fucking shit, there are literally songs posted about genociding Bosnians. I tried to save the thread with Rambo Amadeus, but it is clear it's just a bunch of edgy Americans and diaspora serbs finding an outlet for their nationalist feelings.
>>6093 bruh half of the songs are bosnian
>>6094 The war destroyed Yugoslavia, it shouldn't be glorified. Besides, the only people who glorify the war are drunk nationalists fighting a war with reality and young kids who have grown up removed enough from the war for it to be fun meme material. The war destroyed a lot of lives, and people continue to suffer for it to this day. I don't see videos celebrating Yeltsin destroying the Russian parliament building, or Gorbachev crushing the anti-liberalisation protests, or videos of Putin owning the communists. Why not? It's literally the same as posting pro-war propaganda from Yugoslavia.
>Nigger mod >Tranny janny >Simp cleaner
faggots there's cp on /hobby/
>>6114 Who cares about cp what matters is combating racial slurs on bunkerchan that's the real issue
>>5320 Janny cocksucker deleted the thread about erotica and ideology. Which was starting to have traction. Faggots. We where all agreeing on something for once
>>6116 If you want to talk about erotica you can do it on /GET/. Explaining American racial relations through a fetish book is, at the very least, idpol-adjacent.
CP on /anime/ mods, please fix it!
(214.70 KB 454x520 jansoy.png)
>don't like thread >it's not against the rules >delete it so another mod can't unanchor it Post yfw
>>6118 >Explaining American racial relations through a fetish book is, at the very least, idpol-adjacent Delete every critical theory thread next. Adorno was idpol too? I mean he wrote about Der blaue Engel, a musical. I'd say he was idpol too. Meantime leave all the "slavery benefitted whites" or the doomer posting or the epic anti nazi meme thread up. Also the book in question was an example the subject of the thread was pornography and ideology. At least unlock the other thread
That deletion was painfully stupid. janny.
Why did you bumplock my thread: https://bunkerchan.xyz/leftypol/res/743007
Why did jannie delete my "doubts" thread
>>6138 What was it about?
>>6114 Bitch where?
(102.51 KB 1600x810 imperialism.png)
I wish to complain about my ban for "imperialism" >>743371 Before the ban, someone said the charges against Milosevic were posthumously dropped, which is outright false. Following the ban, a link was posted breezily attributing to the Karadzik trial's incidental statements a total exoneration of Milosevic and the Yugoslavian government from culpability in the genocides, and from favoritism toward the Serbs. To the contrary, regardless of dissent uncovered between Milosevic and the Serbian paramilitaries, the court continues to attribute knowledge and intentional material aid by Milosevic for them: https://balkaninsight.com/2016/08/16/milosevic-s-old-allies-celebrate-his-innocence-08-16-2016/ And such contrarian readings of the trial's findings form part of a broader denialist effort ongoing today: https://theintercept.com/2019/11/20/peter-handke-nobel-prize-bosnian-genocide/ As I said in my ban appeal, the ultimate consequences of NATO intervention are arguable, but the culpability of the Yugoslav government really isn't, and neither are an open-and-shut case. Making discussion of this grounds for banning is retarded.
>>6141 Stfu glowie Milosevic did nothing wrong and all charges were manufactured They even killed him to shut him up since he was making them look bad Death to nato Death to amerikkka
You are doing an atrocious job in the Lebanon thread. That is all.
Are you guys alive?
>>6148 t.zionist
>>6157 t. fed disguising himself as an anti-zionist
>>6158 >implying feds would disguise themselves as anti-zionists
Expand the service offerings beyond the chan. I definitely don't have a horse in that game. :^)
Tip: We should probably try to merge the falling "/ t /" (bad title) thread >>>/leftypol/715906 with the pre-existing, better situated "Piracy General" on >>>/tech/190. Having two is not good for something like this (but now as the /leftypol/ thread is in abortive state one could simply 'copy-paste' over the contributions without issue).
We need to ban people instantly if they start accusing China of rounding up muslims or Assad gassing his own people etc. People talk about leftypol having a positive influence and doing campaigning on the internet, well how are we going to do that if we can't at least oblige users of the site to stand against mike pompeo?
>>6141 please find a site more accommodating to your CIA anarchism.
(19.41 KB 1003x151 Capture.PNG)
This seething retard just deleted all my posts for laughing at him
>>6173 how can i see the banlogs?
>>6174 >>6173 The only way we have of knowing what mods do is when you tell us. There's no way to know what other mods are doing, no logs. Please explain in detail what happened.
>>6175 Go here: https://bunkerchan.xyz/logs.js?boardUri=leftypol And you can replace "leftypol" in the link by any other board.
>>6173 For banning someone for pretending to be a janny so I deleted yours by IP coz I thought you were him with VPN.
(1.09 MB 988x883 1596059095930.png)
I got banned for saying the nigger word on a settler thread what the fuck mods ?
(2.75 KB 615x133 thread cap.png)
this kinda sucks
>>6182 We've had a spammer and one of lynxchan anti-spam measure is to lock thread creation for 1 hour when more than n threads are created in one hour.
there's a schizo nazi posting gore all over the board. how can leftypol deal with ban evasions?
This thread is overflowing with bad-faith argumentation and trolling (by people that conflate USano radlibs with communists so it's probably /pol/tards): >>>/leftypol/754724
(102.78 KB 720x718 1596880728641.jpg)
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWAAWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP
Wojack spam overflowing
>>6185 >how can leftypol deal with ban evasions? That's the question.

Delete
Report

no cookies?