/gulag/ - Meta

Meta Board. Where you belong

catalog
Mode: Reply
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8192

Files

Max file size: 80.00 MB

Max files: 5

Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


If you have questions or need answers you can contact the leftypol staff through matrix @ https://matrix.to/#/+leftychat:matrix.org

(287.60 KB 1500x1600 anarchy.jpg)
Comrade 10/11/2019 (Fri) 06:50:40 No. 2231
since the majority of the board is tankie, can we get a /libsoc/ board?
>>2231
Anon that board would be dead,we need to be together
(71.11 KB 1200x720 freeterritory.png)
>>2232
we thought that would be a great idea, but then you all invaded the Free Territory
There's /dead/
(2.47 MB 435x250 pota.gif)
>>2233
but the Free Territory started it, they robbed from and sabotaged USSR industry
>>2233
>Literal pirates
>>2249
>"but anarchists stole capital!"
tankie outs himself as anti-communist
>>2251
You can't steal from fellow socialists and then proceed to call out their lack of solidarity when they proceed to justifiably fuck you up.
>>2231
>>>/dead/
That's the anarcho board.
>>2231 second this >>2253 dead is not anarchist, its just post left
Make it "communist left". Fuck mutualists.
>>2251 take your meds
this, or at least stop the stupid tankie sectarians
>people come to the democratic solution of tankism <let's split up gang
>>5148 >people come to the democratic solution This site's been biased since its inception. What "democratic" decision it came to several years thereafter becomes irrelevant.
Sectarian boards are a bad idea. People should have to defend their positions in one big board and to help facilitate synthesizing different ideas. t. ancom
>>5169 t. "okay"
/libsoc/ would just move all the radlibs away from the actual radicals. Proper anarchists of any kind would know that any real movement could only do what's necessary. >>5165 The only "democratic" decision that mattered was that people justifiably recognized the "libertarian-authoritarian" axis to be irrelevant in terms of actual effective policy. Picrel. At the end of the day, modern western liberals just need an outlet for what they feel are necessary "civil liberties", and in plenty of places anarchists are able to acquire actual liberties such as housing. So any capable movement would need to present itself as a synthesis of ideas. This means recognizing the necessity of some "tankie" ideas (such as the CNT-FAI had to do, like forced labor camps) and desirability of some "anarchist" ideas (such as the practiced democracy of USSR after the revolution, before bureaucratization) SPLITTERS = WRECKERS = SABOTAGERS = SPAMMERS = THE TRUE GLOW
>>5169 SHUT UP ANARKIDDIE I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU COME SEE ME IRL, SEE WHAT HAPPENS YOU DEGENERATE FUCK! THIS IS ML SITE NOW, STAY IN GULAG 'TIL DEATH TRANNY LIB MOTHERFUCKER t. average ML
>>5171 It's not splitting if it's still on the same site you fucking moron. Forcing autistic MLs and ancoms to use the same singular board doesn't help anyone but reactionaries that laugh at the derail infighting from the sidelines. I think this is a good idea: >>5166
>>5173 >he doesn't remember the /leftypol/ - /leftpol/ split newfags, goddamn. The discussion is what makes this place worth a damn, fuck off to some reddit hugbox if you don't like that.
Please no.
>>2231 /leftypol/ is a non-sectarian left imageboard. if you feel like your special leftist ideology is under attack, learn to defend it better and persuade the tankies you're correct sectarian struggles are retarded though, we should all ride with whatever communist group that is more likely/able to gain real power.
>>5278 >/leftypol/ is a non-sectarian left imageboard. if you feel like your special leftist ideology is under attack, learn to defend it better and persuade the tankies you're correct Acting as if /leftypol/ has ever been "non-sectarian" is some of the most retarded newfaggotry that persists here. That epithet is a running joke and has never stopped both anons and jannies from engaging in some of the most virulent sectarianism imaginable. Even reddit has less sectarianism. I personally don't have a problem with sectarian struggle, but I find this big lie about antisectarianism on bunkerchan to be among the most corrosive and insidious covers for authoritarian sectarianism imaginable. The only reason why you even think you can say that without a hint of irony is because you benefit from this bullshit and your right-wing ideology is privileged through it. If you aren't even doing so consciously, then you truly are owned by the idealism that was instructed within you. No amount of robust criticism will persuade right-wingers like tankies. You are assuming those scum are intellectually honest or capable of independent thought, which has no basis in reality whatsoever. Their own ideology explicitly encourages as much! Suggesting that those of us who criticize their incessant reactionary crap do so and merely bare through the impenetrable bigotry and deafening cacaphony of victimization and political correctness is just a restatement of the status quo. I already know you aren't a leftist, but I didn't take you to be so wed to the present conditions. >sectarian struggles are retarded though, we should all ride with whatever communist group that is more likely/able to gain real power. And if you think this generic affirmation won't necessarily be coded in ideological terms by tankies to mean basically only ML parties, then you're a fucking idiot who carries their water for free.
>>5278 This one hundred percent: >>5280
(33.29 KB 590x572 08948578967346.jpg)
>>5280 >tfw
>>2231 this board supports theory and actually existing socialism and strongly opposes liberalism read engles
>>2233 you are aware the free territory was a bureaucratic bourgeois system that caused future famines to happen, not to mention it was capitalist as fuck

Delete
Report

no cookies?