/gulag/ - Meta

Meta Board. Where you belong

catalog
Mode: Thread
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8192

Files

Max file size: 80.00 MB

Max files: 5

Captcha
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


If you have questions or need answers you can contact the leftypol staff through matrix @ https://matrix.to/#/+leftychat:matrix.org

(137.61 KB 1125x1711 lol.jpg)
Jannies should ban radlibs from the board Anonymous 07/21/2020 (Tue) 19:46:04 No. 5460 [Reply] [Last]
Lately in these days I've seen some radlib here and there shitting up the board. I would ask the radlib if it possible to extend our policy against incels to radlibs and assorted liberals as a whole.
38 posts and 3 images omitted.
(3.34 MB 2100x2100 postonref.png)
Agree, now post on /ref/
(64.13 KB 285x350 1432650239658587.png)
>>5464 People who do the following things Lenin talked about: >Bernstein has surrounded this political demand with a whole battery of well-attuned “new” arguments and reasonings. Denied was the possibility of putting socialism on a scientific basis and of demonstrating its necessity and inevitability from the point of view of the materialist conception of history. Denied was the fact of growing impoverishment, the process of proletarisation, and the intensification of capitalist contradictions; the very concept, “ultimate aim”, was declared to be unsound, and the idea of the dictatorship of the proletariat was completely rejected. Denied was the antithesis in principle between liberalism and socialism. Denied was the theory of the class struggle, on the alleged grounds that it could not be applied to a strictly democratic society governed according to the will of the majority, etc.
>>5497 Radlib spotted. Just because Uncle Joe makes your panties twist doesn't mean shit. >>5496 I know this is probably mean to be satire, but honestly that's unironically what radlibs believe. >>5476 >Cult like deference Deference to whom or what you brainlet? >pedo 8chan 1) outdated as fuck 2) leftypol has always been anti-pedo, and pedo/lolicon shills are banned to /GET/ and /ded/ Radlibs are easy to spot given that they A) can't stop bitching about Muh conservatives B) thinks that debunking myths about the American South or modern feminism is reactionary C) thinks that "uthority is evul" and insult Castro & the USSR as horrible

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>5474 >nature, biology, mental health Because those are not tied directly to politics... regardless those threads more often than not belong on >>>/hobby/ >>5475 A lot recently. The Russian thread had some guy shitting themselves over a Russian leftist movie reviewer because they have VK posts detailing a debunk of myths on General Lee and the American South, that points out the hypocrisy and embellishments of liberal shit-talking.
>>5460 Why would radlibs ban radlibs?

Thread for recording Vol misbehavior Comrade 07/12/2020 (Sun) 01:10:45 No. 5288 [Reply] [Last]
>>683925 Anchoring this thread claiming it's idpol which it is ckearly not Then anchoring >>683902 even though it was edited to avoid triggering their liberal sensitivites
20 posts and 2 images omitted.
>>5348 it does not date back to the earliest days of the board. bunkerchan maybe /leftypol/ no. That was only brought in post old BO fit
Being a jannie is idpol
>Everything I don't like is a /pol/ trolling Shut the fuck up and grow up janny.
>>5387 Correct
>>5288 This board is run by radlibs. We need a new place to migr8 to

Define NSFW, SFW Comrade 07/16/2020 (Thu) 14:53:47 No. 5364 [Reply] [Last]
So I've been wondering about this for a while. The /anime/ board doesn't have a *SFW* tag next to its name, and yet it seems that everything nsfw is spoiled. Why is this? Do we have to spoiler it or is it just a habit and we can just show it without spoiling it?
>>5364 I think spoilering is just a courtesy for all boards on the site. After all even /GET/ censors any overt genitalia.
Yeah, it's mostly just courtesy and some of us have jobs.

(287.60 KB 1500x1600 anarchy.jpg)
Comrade 10/11/2019 (Fri) 06:50:40 No. 2231 [Reply] [Last]
since the majority of the board is tankie, can we get a /libsoc/ board?
23 posts and 4 images omitted.
>>5278 >/leftypol/ is a non-sectarian left imageboard. if you feel like your special leftist ideology is under attack, learn to defend it better and persuade the tankies you're correct Acting as if /leftypol/ has ever been "non-sectarian" is some of the most retarded newfaggotry that persists here. That epithet is a running joke and has never stopped both anons and jannies from engaging in some of the most virulent sectarianism imaginable. Even reddit has less sectarianism. I personally don't have a problem with sectarian struggle, but I find this big lie about antisectarianism on bunkerchan to be among the most corrosive and insidious covers for authoritarian sectarianism imaginable. The only reason why you even think you can say that without a hint of irony is because you benefit from this bullshit and your right-wing ideology is privileged through it. If you aren't even doing so consciously, then you truly are owned by the idealism that was instructed within you. No amount of robust criticism will persuade right-wingers like tankies. You are assuming those scum are intellectually honest or capable of independent thought, which has no basis in reality whatsoever. Their own ideology explicitly encourages as much! Suggesting that those of us who criticize their incessant reactionary crap do so and merely bare through the impenetrable bigotry and deafening cacaphony of victimization and political correctness is just a restatement of the status quo. I already know you aren't a leftist, but I didn't take you to be so wed to the present conditions. >sectarian struggles are retarded though, we should all ride with whatever communist group that is more likely/able to gain real power. And if you think this generic affirmation won't necessarily be coded in ideological terms by tankies to mean basically only ML parties, then you're a fucking idiot who carries their water for free.
>>5278 This one hundred percent: >>5280
(33.29 KB 590x572 08948578967346.jpg)
>>5280 >tfw
>>2231 this board supports theory and actually existing socialism and strongly opposes liberalism read engles
>>2233 you are aware the free territory was a bureaucratic bourgeois system that caused future famines to happen, not to mention it was capitalist as fuck

(23.05 KB 399x399 1588454814049.jpg)
Can we just start banning accelerationists? Comrade 06/23/2020 (Tue) 04:09:52 No. 5024 [Reply] [Last]
you can literally get away with shilling ANY reactionary policy you want on /leftypol/ as long as it's not blatantly racist and you do it under the guise of "accelerationism". there's definitely been an increase in this style of posting ever since the riots so the Feds are most likely involved with it no doubt. <Vote republican! <fuck succdems, unions, and co-ops! the workers need to be in bondage and constant surveillance in order to feel oppressed! <only third world agrarians who don't even have the industry to manufacture weapons can hold a revolution! it's cointelpro shit and what's worse is that I'm pretty sure all the non-fed special snowflake MLs are completely eating this shit up. these disabled retards need to be saved from themselves, you'd be doing them a service really, by at least banning the obvious feds.
11 posts omitted.
anotha one >>684394
>>5024 <ban people for having opinions I don't like If their opinions are bad, make yourself useful and argue a counterposition in the thread. Don't just go whining to the jannies like a retarded child because your delicate fee-fees got hurt.
>>5326 it’s not about fee-fees dumbass teenager. it’s about having a sincere conversation without dealing with tactical nihilists spamming with their edgy “arguments”
>>5193 How is this fucking glowposting? It's absolutely correct. Libya was never socialist despite its social welfare and certain socialist tendencies.
>>5202 >gaddagi bad because socdem Well that's the poster's problem, not the OP

(91.14 KB 940x529 Jim Dowson combat.jpg)
Comrade 07/14/2020 (Tue) 23:59:03 No. 5346 [Reply] [Last]
why the fuck have you banned me for a whole week
i dunno

Sage#+GbZOp 07/12/2020 (Sun) 01:10:06 No. 5287 [Reply] [Last]
Mods why do you keep blocking that unity thread? And where did the "we are not he largest online lefty community" go as well? wtf is going on
2 posts omitted.
>>5294 i can see why they banned tor, makes it harder for people to post cp.
>>5296 I'm not gonna go over this again. If you're interested in why banning tor out of the blue and talking down to users after it was done without a thread to brainstorm solutions then read through it yourself: >>659377 I'm thankful that the mods listened to the criticism and are now seemingly even setting up an onion server.
>>5287 >And where did the "we are not he largest online lefty community" go as well? wtf is going on Would really like an explanation for this one.
>>5294 Mods don't get demoted. Pyongyang did his shit and he only got removed as a mod because he asked for it. Mods here are like cops in the US. I'm sick of the us v. them attitude they have.
>>5310 Realistically, whatever we do is going to piss someone off. If this was a traditional forum with accounts, then perhaps we could do some kind of 'moderator recall' thing, but this is an anonymous imageboard, there's no way to run any kind of votes that would be representative of the board and not able to be cheated. So, you'll just have to deal with our oversight of each other I'm afraid. I feel that we are more tolerant and openminded than almost any other moderation team on the internet, frankly.

(127.87 KB 1200x675 1490570259982.jpg)
Is the report feature broken? Comrade 07/12/2020 (Sun) 18:07:26 No. 5305 [Reply] [Last]
I was trying to report >>>/leftypol/685382 for idpol retardation but it always says wrong or expired captcha no matter what I do and reloading.
yea it’s broken. we are fully at the whim of mod’s attentiveness. thanks lynxchan!
>>5307 lel, what a wonderful time to remove the moderation thread

(27.88 KB 1311x261 Screenshot_129.png)
Comrade 07/11/2020 (Sat) 20:44:06 No. 5281 [Reply] [Last]
Mods, please explain this clear display of newfaggotry.
Please link to the thread.
>>5283 undone.

Bring back the idpol thread Comrade 01/22/2020 (Wed) 16:09:59 No. 3985 [Reply] [Last]
I want to bitch about trans idpol and every time a make a thread about it it gets deleted. Has Trans idpol become accepted here? I want normie liberals to leave. As for the incelposting problem that the other idpol general had. Maybe the mods and jannies should just take a more active approach to moderating the thread and ban anyone who goes off on a ridiculous tangent and starts spamming the thread.
85 posts and 2 images omitted.
>>>/leftypol/677997 I thought this thread was quite thoughtful and likely to provoke useful discussion, can we unbumplock it? http://archive.is/PazxT Archive in case vols only get around to looking at it after it falls off the bottom of the board
>>5256 (me) Also there was a rather good effort post that got lost >>>/leftypol/679047 Due to a bumplock
This fucking thread is up to the brim of reactionaries. It's a real shame to have them as """""""comrades""""""".
>>5256 it's nothing special but fine that other thread, not a fucking chance in hell
>>5258 >it's nothing special but fine Thankyou >that other thread, not a fucking chance in hell Fair enough, I've salvaged one of the good posts into the effort post thread now for the other one

Delete
Report

no cookies?