/gulag/ - Meta

Meta Board. Where you belong

catalog
Mode: Thread
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8192

Files

Max file size: 80.00 MB

Max files: 5

Captcha
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


If you have questions or need answers you can contact the leftypol staff through matrix @ https://matrix.to/#/+leftychat:matrix.org

(119.60 KB 1024x576 1-0mJk9zDw6JvG6l1WdQXK3w.jpeg)
Can we talk about how counter-intuitive the set-up of bunkerchan is? Anonymous 10/16/2020 (Fri) 20:15:54 No. 7719 [Reply] [Last]
Guys, something needs to change. After /trash/ was yeeted from the board for arbitrary and unwise reasons, /IG/ basically turned into /trash/ because all other boards are dead and noone want's to post there. Hell /IG/ turned into /mu/ for a little while because /hobby/ is fucking dead and noone wants to post there. Don't believe me? Look at the fucking thread. This board needs generals where people can actually except to get some responses and feedback on the stuff they do. >People can just go to other boards Yeah but they don't, cuz they're dead. Look at how /IG/ turned into /mu/, that's how much of a hassle it is to post on other boards, let alone dead boards. >Those generals would take up space What, valuable space taken up by threads such as: CORN MAN BAD-thread, which rightly would belong on /GET/ or whereever trash went? >>1003375 Why explore space-thread, which one easily could argue belongs on /edu/

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

91 posts and 10 images omitted.
>>7837 Dude, I have literally done a thing where I stayed on bunkerchan until 4 in the morning and the posts were low AF at night all Summer. The majority of users are not Eastern Eurasians.
>>7839 >they wanna talk about games in a thread that gets responses Or you just use your brain and agree to follow the rules and POST in the appropriate board? Eh?
>>7853 Okay so it's >It's only slow at night so it's not a problem <well I'm not american so I'm affected by the adversly >fuck you then, we made the rules for the community to serve, not for the rules to serve the community
>>7857 1) There is more than 1 poster 2) >only slow at night so it's not a problem That wasn't the fucking point. The point is that activity and PPH is inaccurate and depends on time and subject (and numerous other details) >we made the rules for the community to serve Actually we made rules that were agreed upon by the community, and the community should stick to them. Moreover that is an utter fallacy, because the point is that activity is low at night., this has nothing to do with "muh thread getting responses" since your argument was disregarding time utterly. Nobody is going to be responding either way, so the point is nil.
>>7858 >Moreover that is an utter fallacy, because the point is that activity is low at night., this has nothing to do with "muh thread getting responses" since your argument was disregarding time utterly. Okay, the reason I am disregarding the time of day reletive to the US is that' if you don't you are doing to get results that are american-centric and only takes American needs and voices into account. This is the reason I have calculated average PPH, because internationalist perspectives and inclusiveness matters on social platforms and ought matter even more so on leftist ones. >That wasn't the fucking point. The point is that activity and PPH is inaccurate and depends on time and subject (and numerous other details) Okay, then tell me a way in which we may measure the kind of activity that goes on at the smaller boards and I'll happily try to measure that for you. Would you be more happy with an experiment where only certain hours of the day are considered, and not just for single threads, but for the entire board. Would that produce a result that in your mind would be more reliable to you? If not, then what would? Unless you're saying that comparative statistical analysis is completely invalid and you don't care about it, because then your beliefs as to how the chan is supposed to function is not based on anything I can prove or disprove. >Actually we made rules that were agreed upon by the community, and the community should stick to them.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.


Comrade 10/15/2020 (Thu) 02:59:35 No. 7700 [Reply] [Last]
How do I watch threads How do I use flairs Pic unrelated
>>7700 cool pic :D

/leftylgbt/? 10/16/2020 (Fri) 02:21:51 No. 7707 [Reply] [Last]
we should have a /leftylgbt/ as a board. because pic related is the alternative
4 posts and 1 image omitted.
>>7711 The level of ideology in that quote is staggering.
(791.89 KB 1057x1079 rsa6rq19ouu01.png)
As a lesbian i don't want a shitty fucking board to validate my existence I don't want idpol in my communism soup
>>7789 Based Lesbian
(157.15 KB 1322x422 Freik homosexuals.PNG)
>>7711 >>7712 See pic related and the Esoteric Nazi thread.
>>7707 your Pic related only proves Gorky was correct again

(44.85 KB 700x525 6549867485674589645.jpeg)
Important question about Marxist Theory and Moderation on Bunkerchan Anonymous 10/16/2020 (Fri) 23:02:12 No. 7780 [Reply] [Last]
Go ahead and ban me mods, won't try to ban evade. I'm here to help you guys Should Marxist spaces not be arranged and moderated according to Marxian principles? Considering how this vital thread: >>>/gulag/7719 Was yeeted from this board where the masses could participate and willfully moved to a place where as few people could participate in the organizational principles of Bunkerchan, is that not then a breach in the principles of democracy and the mass-line? What theorectical principles or theory would justify having as few people as possible participate in the conversation? Is that a theoretical framewaork you agree with? If not, can we say that the praxis of the bunkerchan moderation team is currently not conforming to best marxist practices and must be criticized on their theoretical foundation?
1 post omitted.
>>7780 THIS IS A QUESTION ABOUT THEORY NOT MODERATION
>>7780 Kys
>>7791 Where's the argument? Is this why we pull all feedback to this dumbass dead board, so you can ban all dissent, even if its a discussion on theory, and then spam "kys" so that noone sees it? Are mod powers the only things that will get you hard or something?
Imagine you are writing for ASS Daily and suddenly start putting out articles about the social history of the Bretagne. This would greatly anger and confuse your readers. Writing for ASS Daily there is an expectation that your output has a connection to ASS.
The thread was pinned, people discussed, discussion dropped and the thred unpinned. Done. People don't like the idea of leftyb or removing hobby, anime etc. It's not fair to the collectively +36 thousand posts made on those boards already, most of which are actually worth a damn. Stop making half-a-dozen threads whining about boards you don't like, MFW.

Comrade 10/16/2020 (Fri) 14:44:11 No. 7718 [Reply] [Last]
Requesting pics related as flag to represent islamic communism instead of the lame shit we currently have. Take your pick lads

(59.70 KB 1360x764 Xi-Jinping.jpg)
Comrade 11/30/2019 (Sat) 01:52:05 No. 2789 [Reply] [Last]
Put a reply button at the bottom of thread pages please.
This
Just click on any post number and the quick reply window will come up

Sage#+GbZOp 07/12/2020 (Sun) 01:12:38 No. 5290 [Reply] [Last]
Oh and also mods, what with the influx of redditors, instead of getting mad and throwing the ban hammer, I strongly urge you to consider the creation of an idpol gulag. At least this time it would be full of redditors and not incels, and it will help to integrate the redditors in, while containing their worst elements
Based idea
there is no influx of redditors lol, this board hasn't grown in months, and I'm confident the jannoids can confirm this.
>>5290 This is genuinely a good idea. Better keep that stuff confined into a single place rather than having to ban every single person that shows up to talk about that.
This was debunked comrade

Comrade 08/19/2020 (Wed) 16:50:52 No. 6448 [Reply] [Last]
Calling everyone feds or glossies with no proofs should be a bannable offence. This would not stand in any irl leftist or radical space and is ironically a fed tactic demonstratobly used to destroy spaces and movements.
How would we prove glowness? Should every accusation be accompanied by a spoilered message saying "or a useful idiot for them"? Should all accusations of real organizations as being "honeypots" also state "or at least infiltrated by ..." to be factual?
It's the equivalence of accusing somebody of repeating ruling ideology talking points. It's a decent rhetorical device, it would probably be better to make it a verb to denote that it's something that people did, rather than something they are. The entire tactic of destroying leftist space with accusatory spirals, can be avoided if you focus on actions, you know say to people, you are doing something wrong, rather than saying you are a "wrong-person". They aren't doing much beyond pushing the button that triggers the clerical instinct to excommunicate. if you focus on actions this is bypassed.
>>6498 >How would we prove glowness? Here? We dont. >Should all accusations of real organizations as being "honeypots" also state "or at least infiltrated by ..." to be factual? Yes. >>6499 I broadly agree but the internet for most is a place of words, not actions.
>This would not stand in any irl leftist or radical space and is ironically a fed tactic demonstratobly used to destroy spaces and movements. Yeah but it's completely harmless here, since it's an anonymous imageboard and therefore calling someone a glowie doesn't actually do anything other than maybe derail the conversation a bit, unlike IRL where it can have actual consequences for the group and the people being accused. It's really not worth banning people over, especially since it's mostly just polemics rather than an actual accusation.

(125.17 KB 414x371 uwotmate.png)
Where is the Mod feedback thread? Anonymous 10/09/2020 (Fri) 16:12:46 No. 7596 [Reply] [Last]
Serious talk lads. Where is the fucking Mod feedback thread? Last time I was here it was right fucking there at the top where everyone could see it where it should be. I look around and what I do you think I see? It is in the fucking GULAG, the shithole of the internets where no living soul dwells. This can't do lads. Collective judgement should be held in the open, not swept under the carpet.
21 posts omitted.
>>7678 >never visited The number of posts in all of them say otherwise >not even clear what /gulag/ <complaining about chan culture Ok reddit >hiding this thread I'm not a mod > don’t want other anons to see what people are complaining about It is extremely simple to link this thread in leftypol and mention it to people. >Pin the feedback thread to the top of leftypol There is already a pinned thread that has a full FAQ and people complain to the mods all the time there you dolt >so ass mad projecting much? >couldn't make sense your sentence is half gibberish to me, so unironically 'no u'
>>7597 >>7599 >>7605 >>7607 >>7623 >>7667 >>7676 Mods should be required to post with their tag on in /gulag/, because this shit is annoying. >mods=gods >newfaggot <when you learn about chan culture from 2005 4chan screenshots
>>7687 >post with their tag They do. I'm not a mod on this site.
>>7691 only when they want to, but on the /meta/ board it should be a requirement. Cause often mods will post as users to defend their actions to make it seem like there's popular support. Us, users, can never know if we're talking to a mod or not
>>7694 That's fair enough. I agree with this.

Give us the SSNP flag Comrade 08/12/2020 (Wed) 17:00:59 No. 6309 [Reply] [Last]
Give us the SSNP flag
17 posts and 5 images omitted.
>>6399 glowtard
>>6342 It was a test, fag. It shows how shitty the implementation is if spoilers can only work on a single line. [code] This is also a test but I bet you'll be too stupid to see [/code]
SSNP are literally socdems >pro-capitalism >pro strong social security, education and welfare >anti-communism The thing they have going for them is that they're secular, but other than that, they're not revolutionary.
>>6436 Well we do have a socdem flag
Mods pull through

Delete
Report

no cookies?